Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agoOctober 1poptalk.scrubbles.techexternal-linkmessage-square26linkfedilinkarrow-up1387arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up1385arrow-down1external-linkOctober 1poptalk.scrubbles.techScrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agomessage-square26linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarecriss_cross@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up26·14 hours agoShe explicitly did not want to be sexualized in those ads. She made IG stories about it.
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-24 hours agoShe was legit mad when she found out she had a reddit sub dedicated to her honkers. Also she’s in the hot chip hungry child video too. https://youtu.be/rOnMZALLQPk
minus-squarefunkajunk 🇨🇦@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up29arrow-down2·16 hours agoBecause you dont need to sexualize the AT&T employees?
minus-squarecouldhavebeenyou@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down14·15 hours agoBut they are desexualising them
minus-squareFrostyTheDoo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down4·14 hours agoYou’re implying women are to be sexualized by default, and that it’s a good thing
minus-squarecorsicanguppy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 hours agoRemind us which parts of a human are sinful to acknowledge, and why more of those put women at a disadvantage again? It seems a little sexist.
minus-squarefinallymadeanaccount@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·21 minutes agoAorta. So sexy.
minus-squaremultifariace@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·11 hours agoI can sexualize everyone. I can also respect everyone as individuals with autonomy. Both can be true.
minus-squareGreenKnight23@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·11 hours agoif not to be sexualized why is it sexual shaped? /s
minus-squaretroglodytis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·15 hours agoWho’s they? She directed those commercials
minus-squarecouldhavebeenyou@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up4·12 hours agoOw. If it’s by her own choice of course I’m ok with it
minus-squareSalmiakDragon@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·15 hours agoImplying that breasts (or women?) are inherently sexual?
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·13 hours agoProbably just the breasts, but not inherently, just sociologically. 🤷♂️
But why
She explicitly did not want to be sexualized in those ads. She made IG stories about it.
She was legit mad when she found out she had a reddit sub dedicated to her honkers.
Also she’s in the hot chip hungry child video too.
https://youtu.be/rOnMZALLQPk
Task failed.
Because you dont need to sexualize the AT&T employees?
You don’t know my needs.
But they are desexualising them
You’re implying women are to be sexualized by default, and that it’s a good thing
Remind us which parts of a human are sinful to acknowledge, and why more of those put women at a disadvantage again? It seems a little sexist.
Aorta. So sexy.
I can sexualize everyone. I can also respect everyone as individuals with autonomy. Both can be true.
if not to be sexualized why is it sexual shaped?
/s
Who’s they? She directed those commercials
Ow. If it’s by her own choice of course I’m ok with it
Implying that breasts (or women?) are inherently sexual?
Probably just the breasts, but not inherently, just sociologically. 🤷♂️