Only partially. They could be implying that all humans, regardless of gender are to be sexualized by default and that’s a good thing. If that’s what they’re saying, then I agree with them wholeheartedly.
It’s not a problem to acknowledge any body part or attraction to it. It’s weird to signal that ads not prioritizing showing off the boobies means they’re missing something (referring to the desexualizing comment).
The actress has nice large breasts. Great, I like them too. AT&T didn’t rely on them to sell products, but instead decided to focus the viewer’s attention on their products and services. What’s wrong with that? It’s a mobile internet service, not Hooters.
You’re implying women are to be sexualized by default, and that it’s a good thing
I can sexualize everyone. I can also respect everyone as individuals with autonomy. Both can be true.
Only partially. They could be implying that all humans, regardless of gender are to be sexualized by default and that’s a good thing. If that’s what they’re saying, then I agree with them wholeheartedly.
if not to be sexualized why is it sexual shaped?
/s
No, he’s saying boobs are a good thing
Remind us which parts of a human are sinful to acknowledge, and why more of those put women at a disadvantage again? It seems a little sexist.
Aorta. So sexy.
I mean, people sexualize feet ffs.
It’s not a problem to acknowledge any body part or attraction to it. It’s weird to signal that ads not prioritizing showing off the boobies means they’re missing something (referring to the desexualizing comment).
The actress has nice large breasts. Great, I like them too. AT&T didn’t rely on them to sell products, but instead decided to focus the viewer’s attention on their products and services. What’s wrong with that? It’s a mobile internet service, not Hooters.