• BambiDiego@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 hours ago

    So much silliness in this thread, I love it.

    To be the wet blanket, no, Nintendo did the right thing because they learned their lesson from Wii U, and to a lesser extent from the New 3DS

    It’s not about the players, it’s about who buys it, and the ones who buy it are parents and adults who aren’t always up to date on gaming news.

    PS2, PS3, PS4, PS5. That makes sense, you want the latest one? Buy the bigger number.

    Wii U? I already have a Wii at the house, the kids don’t even use it. It’s a tablet? They already have a tablet though.

    New 3DS? I already got a DS and they tricked me into the 3DS! I don’t even need the 3D feature, that was a waste of money. It’s still pretty new, I don’t need another new one.

    I worked at GameStop all those releases and I can’t emphasize just HOW MAY TIMES I had those conversations with customers. Not just parents either, but casual consumers.

    Xbox was confusing too eventually.

    Nobody got confused on Playstation.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Xbox started looking at 14yo’s gamer tags and thought that was a good naming convention:

      “XboxoneX”

      • BambiDiego@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’m still not over the fact that not ONE person at Microsoft said “Really? We’re calling it the XBone?”

  • Magiilaro@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The Nintendo Switch is a handheld device, so they should have called it Nintendo Switch Advanced

  • iegod@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Then there’s MS over here ruining decades of easily understood versioning and thinking that was a Good Move™.

  • KingOfTheCouch@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    The Nintendo Router

    Fun side note, I’ve had more than one fun conversation where someone forgets to say “Nintendo” when asking about connecting a switch to my network (especially back when it was a new thing…)

  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Probably didn’t because (among, I’m sure, other reasons) the SNES was such a major upgrade over the NES that it would’ve drawn a negative comparison between the lesser difference of the Switch 2 versus the Switch. Younger audiences wouldn’t get it/wouldn’t care, and older audiences would see it as pandering/unwarranted.

    Could also be that audiences were still wary of the whole Wii/Wii U debacle and just wanted reassurance that it’d be “more of the same but better”.

    And lastly, if they wanted a “Switch 3” in the future, it’s been shown by Xbox that funny naming schemes can go awry after the second iteration.

  • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I’m still bummed they didn’t call the N64 any of the following:

    Ultra Nintendo

    Turbo Nintendo

    Super Duper Nintendo

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      24 hours ago

      It was originally called the Nintendo Ultra 64:

      I think they changed it late in development because they realized there was no “next” name and everyone would have exaggerated any issues with the GameCube being like “Nintendo couldn’t top the Ultra I guess!”

      • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Nintendo when naming their next console:

        Yamauchi: “Hey Shigeru, what should we name our next console?”

        Miyamoto: “No idea. Anyway, I was thinking about going to the aquarium, you wanna join?”

        Yamauchi: “Perfect! We’ll call it the Dolphin!”

        Miyamoto: “…What?”

      • Psythik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        I mean they could have just stopped after the Ultra 64. The GameCube was alright but there was no point in continuing to invest in Nintendo consoles after that unless you’re just a casual gamer.

        I mean the Wii was just an overclocked GameCube with motion controls. The WiiU was just a Wii with a slightly better (yet still outdated) GPU and a worse controller. The Switch 2 is literally just a Switch, again the only difference being that it uses slightly less ancient hardware.

        Nintendo gave up completely in innovating after the 90s. Now all they know how to do is cater to the mainstream and sue their most hardcore fans in the name of profit. I’m tired of their Late Stage Capitalism bullshit!

        • Zanathos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          Quite the interesting take that they “stopped innovating”. Sure their hardware specs have always been lack luster, but Satoru Iwata always focused on fun over bleeding edge. After the Wii, PlayStation and Microsoft followed suite with the PS4 “wand” and Xbox Kinect. After the Switch released, Sony created the PS Portal, not to mention the Steam Deck and other copy cats. They have literally been the top innovators of the last few generations.

        • Tattorack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Nintendo gave up completely in innovating after the 90s.

          Very weird take, especially after mentioning:

          I mean the Wii was just an overclocked GameCube with motion controls.

          PlayStation 3 was just a more powerful PlayStation 2. Xbox 360 was just a more powerful Xbox. Then there is Nintendo who, instead of making a more powerful Gamecube, they went with largely the same hardware but with a radically different control scheme.

          Isn’t that the definition of trying to innovate?

          Also, the Switch format has everything now. I don’t see how anything can innovate further than to radically change what a videogame even is.