• Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    the only way to have your privacy protected these days is to be in the epstien files.

      • titanicx@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yep. In fact I just met an 80 year old guy today that spent his career repairing tvs. Sure were a lot of tv repair men and shops for tvs that never broke.

    • 007Ace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Remember when the tube started to go and you had to leave it on all the time or whack the side of it when you first turned it on for the day, until it warmed up?

  • bimbobear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Spent a few days in an AirBnB with all LGTV’s throughout the house. We never turned them on but today I go on Amazon and its now showing me adverts for the Airbed we briefly talked about in front of the TV -_-

    • f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I repair arcade games and often mention to curious onlookers: “Fifty years of putting miniature particle accelerators in every home and business!”

  • WanderWisley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have an old flat screen tv that I bought from Best Buy in 2011. It is just a tv, no internet, no Bluetooth, just a tv, I still have it and it works perfectly. I finally decided to get a smart tv last summer that POS broke within a year and just after the warranty expired.

  • Anchorxiety@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    4 days ago

    One advantage of modern TVs is how slim they are. It’s so crazy to me now how much space those old TVs took up. You just had a big TV stand sticking out from the wall.

    • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’m using an old console TV that I’ve modified to hold a flat screen. I literally have a home server and a sound bar built into it the space that was originally just the tube and there’s still enough space for my full grown ass to climb inside.

    • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Yeah, but you could use them as a shelf.

      Put stuff on top of them (just be careful when watering the plants).

  • farmgineer@nord.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    4 days ago

    I think that’s some major rose-colored-glasses thinking. They did break. A child with a magnet could also cause issues, at least on older ones (I say having been said child).

    • deHaga@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      I dropped mine down the stairs, the implosion from the vacuum tube was pretty impressive.

    • CalypsoGirl@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Circa late 1980s I remember our dad brought home a degauser from work, hey anyone remember what a degauser is? It was a magnetic box (VERY STRONG MAGNETS) with a tunnel to slide a cassette tape through, to erase the cassette tape. Well I don’t remember which of us family members decided its storage place should be on top of the TV but what a fun science lesson that turned out to be 😄 If you moved the magnet around the TV in all different places, the distortion on the screen would follow wherever the magnet was, and IIRC the screen distortion wasn’t permanent. The screen went back to normal when you removed the magnet from the vicinity.

      • f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        TVs have their own degaussing coil built-in, it’s the short buzz you hear first when the TV is turned on.

        If the metal frame around the front of the tube becomes strongly magnetized, that’s when the distortion is “permanent”, meaning it’s not permanent but not really feasible to fix.

      • Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        We tried with magnet, no where as strong as the ones you’ve mentioned, but still, it messed up the image. It was fun.

      • farmgineer@nord.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        IIRC It messes with the beam guides. I’m not sure if there are cases/designs in which it would cause permanent damage in color TVs, but I seem to think I managed to permanently tint our older one green somehow.

    • rethnor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I had some unshielded noise speakers that would change the color when swiped across the screen in one direction. And cleared it when swiped the other direction. Fun times!

  • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    “your TV needs to install an update, please connect to the internet”, it says

    how did it know it needed an update?

    I am 60% sure I have seen this happen IRL

  • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    CRTs did break. And they did suffer from burning.

    Just buy a non-smart modern TV, you won’t need a replacement and it won’t connect to the internet.

    • Logical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      Please tell me where I can get a modern high-res TV that is NOT smart. I have tried but cannot find them anywhere

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        I recently bought a Thomson TV that’s HD and with no smart features at all. The only downside is that the image contrast is not the best.

          • Scrollone@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Enjoy! I’ve also bought their Google TV stick (same brand, I think it’s re-branded as ONN in the US though). It works well and I can just switch it in the future, without replacing the TV.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Your best bet would be a commercial display. Though it’ll be double the price, at least, and you’ll need an hdmi switch and a soundbar more like as not.

      • titanicx@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Just buy a tv, then don’t connect it to anything. But likely that you are going to connect something smart to it, so it doesn’t matter.

        • Logical@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          It is possible to put it in a VLAN that is unable to talk to the internet. This is fine, but I wish I could just get a TV that doesn’t have this tracking functionality to begin with.

        • wooferTwo@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Have seen Samsungs hostility TVs, but only resource on them I could find was their own official store pages which are woefully void of any info I actually care about

          • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            We have a mix of commercial samsung and sharp TV’s for signboards. Both come with a proprietary signboard system but I use Pi5’s and google slides to manage them all. Every great now and then I have to reset something.

      • NoWay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        What’s a quality panel? You mean you can’t natively get clear resolution on your TV? Doesn’t sound very smart to me.

        • wooferTwo@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          You know there are more variables that contribute to the quality of the TV than the resolution? Like how bright it gets or how accurate it’s colors are and what it’s color space coverages are… Or how deep the blacks are or if the pixel response is decent. I guess people draw the line at different places and most probably don’t care at all… I do, but I also consider my privacy as a variable here. I am in a niche group of people that are completely underserved as I have looked and have not found… So if someone claims they know of some I ask them for their wisdom.

      • titanicx@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        You can a modern tv way way easier. I do it all the time. And you don’t risk electrocution or exposure, and it can be done in about 15 minutes for most issues.

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Just in case anybody is stupid enough to believe this, there was nothing radioactive in old CRT-based TVs. And they sometimes had black cases but weren’t a “black box”.

    They worked by bending a beam of electrons that hit phosphors in the screen, which is cool enough that saying stupid BS about “radioactive” is unnecessary.

    • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      4 days ago

      CRTs can emit X-Rays, but they are properly shielded so they never leave the tube.

      The X-Ray scare mostly came from a line of GE TV’s in 1968 that had improper shielding and had to be recalled.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Radioactivity and X-Rays are tangentially related, but they’re not at all the same thing.

        • Equinox1289@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          One is from a decaying material and the other is from controlled electron beam, but they are both radiation emitters. People are just more familiar with the term radioactive and think it is the catch-all term for a source of radiation.

          The electron gun in a tv and in an xray machine are pretty similar and without shielding, you will still get hit with radiation even if it isn’t strictly radioactive, but rather another type of radiation emitter.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            One is from a decaying material

            Specifically radioactive decay.

            the other is from controlled electron beam

            So, not radioactivity.

            Radiation is a really vague term. It’s just energy moving in the form of waves or particles. Sunlight is radiation. Radio waves are radiation. Microwaves are radiation. Wifi is radiation.

            Radiation can be dangerous in a few ways. Something can be very bright and blind you, or it can cause you to heat up too much. X-rays are an example of ionizing radiation, that’s dangerous because it can break apart molecular bonds, causing damage to cells. That’s why you can get skin cancer from ultraviolet radiation. X-rays are a shorter wavelength than ultraviolet light, so there’s more potential cellular damage per photon.

            But, radioactivity is dangerous not just because of X-rays, but primarily because of alpha and beta particles, and because of even higher energy particles like gamma particles / rays.

            So, just because there’s one type of ionizing radiation that can come from a CRT-TV that is also peripherally associated with radioactive decay doesn’t mean that there’s any connection between a TV and radioactivity.

            That would be like saying that an atomic bomb causes a huge explosion, and a fertilizer bomb also causes a huge explosion, so a fertilizer bomb is a nuke.

            • Squirrelanna@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 days ago

              This isn’t me arguing against you because I know very little about the difference. But when I started reading I thought this was a Unidan copypasta 😂

    • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      beam of electrons

      Let’s say it cooler: they were particle accelerators you pointed at your face.

      Also, massive glass vacuum bottles that could implode if mishandled.

      And with massive capacitors that could electrocute you if mishandled.

      And heavy enough to seriously crush your foot (and possibly implode and electrocute you) if mishandled.

      And the static electricity felt really neat on the back of your hand if you put it close to the screen.

      They were so fucking cool, and we took them for granted, and now they’re gone, and life is significantly less cool without them.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        But by fuck was their capacity to put out a clear image mid. But their screen size on the other hand …extremely limited

        • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          TVs, maybe¹. CRT monitors, though? They were great. And mostly didn’t care about what resolution you threw at them.

          1. It’s a big maybe, though. Live TV? Sure, but that was more on the extremely low resolution signal than on the screen (HDTV would’ve looked great on a CRT). But games? They were fantastic for games, though. Artists designed their images with CRT’s natural blur on mind, and now we need complex filters and at least a 4K monitor to replicate the original look.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        And heavy enough to seriously crush your foot (and possibly implode and electrocute you) if mishandled.

        Sometimes. Other times they were little portable things.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            1.2 kg isn’t very much, especially for a dense piece of electronics.

            If you look at the history of iMac computers, when they went from CRTs to flat screens they only dropped 6 kg from 15.7 kg to 9.6 kg. Since then they’ve focused on making them lighter and lighter, but it’s not like the CRT was the majority of the weight.

      • ms.lane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Barium glass.

        Leaded glass was only used for the rear of the tube (or amber monochrome displays), the front glass was barium infused for colour CRTs.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Radioactivity and X-Rays are tangentially related, but they’re not at all the same thing.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’s the equivalent of knowing the difference between “poisonous” and “venomous”

          For the vast majority of people it doesn’t matter. Maybe they learned in 8th grade, but they forgot, because it never came back up.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Not really. Radiation is something you encounter every day. Radioactivity is something you probably never encounter. Most people except Australians rarely encounter poisonous and venomous animals.

    • SirLeToet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      CRTs had flatscreens beat until less than a decade ago, which was nearly 20 years after being replaced by society.

      Higher resolutions, refreshrates and lower latency until the 4k 250fps+ race began.

      However, i doubt there is much more to gain due to CRT being well into the end of the development S-curve.

  • tackleberry@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    First question I asked myself when I saw it was, “Why does my TV have an update?”

    I bought a TV to watch videos, not the other way around. Promptly disconnected that shit from the internet and it will stay that way.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      well sometimes it’s a firmware update and it actually improves the picture quality. Like with the recent LG G6 that had some issues during release