• merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Just in case anybody is stupid enough to believe this, there was nothing radioactive in old CRT-based TVs. And they sometimes had black cases but weren’t a “black box”.

    They worked by bending a beam of electrons that hit phosphors in the screen, which is cool enough that saying stupid BS about “radioactive” is unnecessary.

  • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Something I kind of wonder about this whole "every single modern TV is a smart TV that spies on you more comprehensively than the ones portrayed in “1984"” situation is this: there must surely be some overlap between “facilities that have well-protected state secrets” and the use case for TVs. Like, do they not have any TVs in, say, the pentagon, or CIA facilities, or other country’s equivalents to those things? They might not need like entertainment generally, but displaying video information to a group of people seems like it’d be useful to organizations like that. There’s also people who inherently have secrets surrounding them, like national leaders, and those people will also sometimes expect entertainment.

    So, how do groups like that, who both have a lot of resources to get stuff done and an obvious reason to not want a poorly secured spy device sending information from their facilities and people to some random corporate server, deal with the modern TV situation? Do they exclusively use old TVs? Do they modify off the shelf ones to kill the spying ability? Do they commission companies to make special models for them that aren’t commercially available, or build their own hardware? Or is the inability to buy regular, non-spying new TVs exaggerated, and theres some generic supplier out there that they can reliably get them from?

    • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Eh, that’s industrial displays, and so long as it doesn’t brick the thing, you can take any radio equipment out of a tv before you use it

    • CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’d imagine defense contractors don’t buy hardware that’s made for the general public and givernments only buy from defense contractors or do in house work. You can essentially “rent” a factory in parts of the world and have your own products made there, the higher the “rent” the higher level of quality control. There’s likely an entire industry dedicated to things like this.

    • floridaman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Cathode Ray Dude on YouTube recently released a video about top-secret class computing devices. They are generally purpose built for the government. He explains in depth here if you’re interested, although it’s mainly focused on a particular computer, he does touch on display devices.

      • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Interesting, I dont have the spare time for a video that long at the moment but I did glance at his “detour” section about modern stuff and the bit about just keeping stuff used to talk about secrets in a room rigged up as a faraday cage with a bunch of shielding seems to fit the kind of use I was picturing being a problem in my head.

    • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      do they not have any TVs in, say, the pentagon, or CIA facilities, or other country’s equivalents to those things

      They have air-gapped rooms with lead shielding so it doesn’t really matter if a Spy-TV is in there if it can never connect to anything.

  • Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 hours ago

    they will record you anyways and store the recordings and transcripts long enough that if a future owner of the TV ever connects it, it’ll upload all that shit it’s stored.

    and they know what wifi networks and hardware addresses are nearby so those recordings will be associated with your location even if it uploads them from another physical location.

    these things are all advanced wiretaps that should probably have their antennas permanently destroyed.

      • Noxy@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        31 minutes ago

        Summit for Lemmy on GrapheneOS is a wiretap?

        Firefox with ublock, noscript, and privacybadger on cachyOS is a wiretap?

        cuz I posted this from one of those two.

  • idk (she/her)@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    i bought a crt some time ago for 13$ (50pln), mainly to use with some old computers but gaming on it is cool asf too

  • Anchorxiety@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    6 hours ago

    One advantage of modern TVs is how slim they are. It’s so crazy to me now how much space those old TVs took up. You just had a big TV stand sticking out from the wall.

    • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m using an old console TV that I’ve modified to hold a flat screen. I literally have a home server and a sound bar built into it the space that was originally just the tube and there’s still enough space for my full grown ass to climb inside.

    • Jestzer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      And CRTs are unbelievably heavy in comparison, making them a bitch to move at all.

  • boydster@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I will forever remember using the magnet that came with this old Klutz book near the TV in my parents’ room when I was around 10 and noticing the rainbow pattern it made in the picture. And then, after further investigation and experimentation, noticing those colors stopped going away when I moved the magnet away. And then, never speaking a word of it. For, like, 40 years.

    When Bill Burr’s Netflix cartoon show put a similar bit in an episode it finally dawned on me that lots of kids must have messed up their parents’ TVs with those magnet wands.

  • WesternInfidels@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    There was a time when CRT TVs were so cranky and reliably in need of service that your local drugstore had a rack of replacement tubes and even a tube-tester machine. You could pull a bunch of tubes from your set, test them at the store, and buy a replacement for whichever one was bad.

    • mobyduck648@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      48 minutes ago

      I run a valve (tube) amp as my daily driver for audio and yeah, you do have to have a screw loose in this day and age. They’re a lot better with modern passive components but modern valves are pretty hopeless in terms of longevity. For EL84s you basically have to buy old Soviet military stock (thank fuck Gosplan was so hilariously inefficient) or your amp will burn through them fairly quickly.

      On the other hand if you look after them will probably outlive you. The valves are consumable components but the transformer is literally a big chunk of iron and copper, and they’re dead simple to work on usually. Modern capacitors don’t dry out and turn into resistors nearly as readily too.

      • undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Never having owned a CRT television (LCD was king when I became an adult) I have to say that that looks fucking sick. I don’t think I’ve ever wanted a bulky one until now.

        • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Retro games look better on them and there’s no emulator that has ever pulled off a sufficiently convincing simulation for me. They also render dark colors better than most high end TVs. If you play a lot of old games, it would be neat to have a small one. The big ones, however, weigh a metric ton and are at least as deep as they are wide, and they’re extremely front-heavy. Those aren’t worth it unless you plan to build an entire arcade cabinet around it.

          • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            True. This one is a 10" model and it already weighs a fuck-ton, and it’s quite deep and takes up a lot of space. But I really like how old games (especially PS1 and PS2) look on it.

            I wouldn’t go higher than 14" models because of the weight.

            • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              32 minutes ago

              Non-Sony models aren’t too heavy, especially 27" and below. My 27" CRT is more than managable for me to lift up by myself over my head.

              Sony included thick steel magnetic shielding around their tubes, making them significantly heavier compared to other brands.

    • justdaveisfine@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      6 hours ago

      All of mine did but got increasingly quirkier over time. Sometimes you needed to hit it on top to get the picture looking right. Audio got crackly. The component cables needed a fine touch to display the picture correctly.

      That sort of fun stuff.

    • pewpew@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      In the late 90s to early 2000s they made cheap plastic crap, the circuit board could break if you pushed the power button too hard