• cuerdo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Stop blaming the people, people went to the restaurant and they only had turd soup.

    • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The restaurant had turd soup and stale bread. The people who like bread saw it was stale so they left, and everyone remaining ordered the turd soup.

    • varnia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Some people didn’t care about turd soup in restaurants because the have the third option to cook for themselves. That’s one of the reasons, the rest still has to eat turd soup.

      • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It’s like you don’t understand how elections work.

        The person who wins the election is in charge.

        Unless you are rich enough to go hide out off the grid, you’re eating the turd soup.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      24 minutes ago

      It’s the people’s fault for not selecting the low-sodium turd soup.

      EDIT: Guys, I voted for harris. Stop trying to convince me to vote how I voted in an election that already happened. I’m telling you that if you keep running candidates who won’t represent the people, the people won’t vote for them.

      • SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        They’re both bad, but I would absolutely rather have piss soup than turd soup (to use the analogy here)

        Just because both sides are bad doesn’t mean one side isn’t significantly, exponentially worse.

      • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Frederick Douglas was an escaped slave who fought for Abolition.

        Back in 1860 he had a choice. He could back the Abolition candidate, who was almost certain to lose, or to back Abe Lincoln. Lincoln had said that saving the Union was more important then ending slavery.

        Douglas decided it was smarter to help Lincoln win and get a seat at the table, than to lose and be shut out.

        Did I mention that Douglas had actually been a slave?