• Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    There’s a simple solution to this that I’ve seen some bars in my city do. Make all the cubicles and urinals gender-neutral and mark them as such.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This seems like the obvious solution. An area for stand-up wees. An area for sit-down wees and poos. Everyone can wash their hands together in an open area.

      No need to bring gender into expelling waste. Wouldn’t be surprised to find modern toilets were invented by the Victorians so men wouldn’t have to find out that women also shit.

  • tomkatt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Never thought I’d ask this but… how do I determine the gender of my toilet? And how do I confirm it’s cis-gendered?

  • mudkip@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    They want trans genocide, they aren’t even trying to hide it anymore

    • Clbull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      How is this trans genocide? I’m genuinely wondering how wanting to keep toilets separated by biological sex is genocidal.

      • kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 hour ago

        they are trying to create a legal context in which being transgender and doing normal things in the world is a crime and then they force trans people into the wrong prison where they can forcibly detransition trans people knowing that this will kill them 🫡

        in america they have designated anyone “pro transgender” a terrorist and kansas, ohio, tennessee, texas, and indiana have or are creating trans registries of all the trans people

      • plutopos@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        This isn’t trans genocide, but progressively making it impossible for trans people to exist hints at intolerance for their general existence

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Why do gendered toilets exist anymore? It’s the 21st century and we don’t need them.

      • robocall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        No, we never needed gendered restrooms. IIRC it was established out of an abundance of caution when women started entering the general workforce in WWI. Men were concerned that women may need a place to rest away from men at work. It turns out women are fine and just need a stall to shit equal to everyone else.

        • BigTwerp@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          In ww1 the men’s toilets consisted of a long urinal and a stall at the end to shit in. Society at the time thought it wasn’t appropriate for women to walk past a load of men with their dicks out to get to the one facility they could use.

          Times are different now, though.

    • Clbull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Because peeing and defecating are kinda private activities. One involves the anus, the other involves genitalia. I mean I’m sure a woman wouldn’t want to go into a restroom and see guys with their dicks out peeing in urinals?

  • Professorozone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Do you want people to pee on the bathroom doors? Because that’s how you get people to pee on bathroom doors.

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I thought that toilets were a primarily a public health concern. If they are not provided then unfortunate things start happening in secluded corners.

    • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Isn’t that the goal here? Exclude people from toilets. They have to pee elsewhere. Arrest them for public urination or “indecent exposure”. Maybe put them on some kind of sex offender list like the Americans are doing for people caught urinating in public. Spread fear about “trans sex offenders”.

      • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’m sure you are right. There is a lot of weirdness around this. No one argues that gay people can’t use toilets (at least not yet). Picking on trans people is really pretty much that, misplaced prejudice.

  • auzy1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    I’m having an argument with idiots here in Australia trying to “protect women”. No joke, most of them are toxic blokes who are trying to be masculine. I even got told by one I’m not a man, because I should be protecting women.

    In another thread, there was a guy who was posting back and forth telling me I was a guy dictating things… whilst, I didn’t even comment what should be done. I just commented that climbing gyms are running womxn nights for years without issue and it’s a non issue is causing some of them to go nuts

    In fact, they solved the dilemma entirely by just going unisex (and, the toilet cubicles are full length and mostly soundproof it feels like, so they’re actually awesome

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I think we need to create a government works program to hire toilet patrol enforcement, and require everyone to present their original birth certificates and IDs prior to pissing in any toilet - private or public! /s

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    20 hours ago

    As far as I can tell the UK is the only country in the whole of Europe following America down this specific insane moral and political rabbit-hole.

    It’s like they tried to get into the XXI century, failed and decided to go back to their time of greatness, the Victorian Era.

    • nightlily@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Following? Make no mistake, TERF island has been pioneering this. The American Right has been funding TERF groups there as a test bed. It’s spilling over into the former territories like NZ too - a few days ago the coalition government there voted through a first reading of a „definition of man and woman“ bill (bills go through three readings before becoming law)

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      ah yes the rest of Europe is super tolerant against trans people. LOL. Russia has a laws that forbids gender reassignment surgery. And they have a law that bans LGBTQ “propaganda” basically write or film something positive or even neutral information about the LGBTQ will get you in jail. Hungary and Poland haven’t been very friendly against queers in the last decade. Almost every right wing party in Europe that has “family values” on their agenda wants to see trans people gone.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Hungary and Poland both just emerged from their very own far-right populist period.

        Meanwhile Britain supposedly did too and then elected a supposedly “center” - “left” government and instead of it getting better this shit just got worse. Oh, and the Brexiter Tories were apparently not Right-wing enough for a large fraction of the population so Reform UK rose.

        Even the “left” in Britain are nutters compared to all of Western, Northern and Southern Europe.

        I’ll give you Russia, though - it is indeed comparable to Britain in terms of having 19th century morals.

    • Doorbook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Its interesting change. Considering companies has always been pro whatever is profitable. The question why this shift happened without any push back from companies and wealthy people. In fact most of these decisions seems to cost people more money.

  • Wren@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    22 hours ago

    This is going to make it so difficult to plan out businesses and buildings that everyone will end up with gender neutral bathrooms and spaces. It’s my dream that all those lobby groups who think they’re protecting women will have to shit next to every man, woman, femboy, adult baby, theydy, them, zem, furry and otherkin in the UK.

    • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      20 hours ago

      No, there’s already rules in place from the previous government which says that all new builds and buildings euch are changing their use must have separate, sex-segregated toilets, unless the building is physically too small for anything other than a single room with a single toilet and sink. You can have gender-neutral toilets as well but not instead

      • Wren@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        20 hours ago

        From the article:

        “The law here is a mess, and clearly many businesses will just go gender neutral to avoid the headache,

        • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Extant businesses may. Your post mentioned planning out businesses and buildings. If there’s space for single-sex toilets then under current legislation it would be illegal not to have them. You can thank the Tories for that. Badenoch even explicitly said that it was done to target trans people, although obviously not in quite those words

          • Wren@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I don’t know what you’re arguing with. Planning doesn’t create new space and resources from thin air.

      • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        guardian says these rules allow only providing universal toilets “where there is insufficient space” for separate facilities

  • Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    23 hours ago

    All of this is solved with just using more single occupancy bathrooms. Just an open hallway with rooms and toilets and changing stations. Sinks in the hallway.

    • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Not allowed. I’ll copy from another post:

      No, there’s already rules in place from the previous government which says that all new builds and buildings euch are changing their use must have separate, sex-segregated toilets, unless the building is physically too small for anything other than a single room with a single toilet and sink. You can have gender-neutral toilets as well but not instead

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        All single toilets are sex-segregated if you enter alone and close the door.

        Your sex is on one side of the door, all other sexes are on the other.

        The issue only happens when you attempt to write a sign that predicts the sex, or if more people has to take a shit together in the same room.

        • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          As the law stands at the moment, if you’re building a new non-domestic building or changing the function of an existing building and you have three toilets, each of which is a single room containing one individual toilet and a sink and which can be locked from the inside, then cannot all be accessible to everybody. One must be exclusively for women and one for men. And, as per the new guidence, which one someone can use is solely to be determined by what gender they were assigned at birth

          Yes, it’s incredibly stupid, but that’s what the law currently says

        • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I know, right? This government has chosen to go “well, if the Supreme Court says we have to discriminate against trans people, then i guess we do “, rather than ” if the law can be interpreted in that way then it’s obviously wrong or unclear. We have a large majority and a progressive core of voters, let’s change the law “

          It’s like come on guys, this is exactly the strength of the UK NOT having a written constitution - you can change the law and thereby change the constitution

      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        So make the toilets as outlined above, but on the last two doors in the row mark one male and one female.

        • bthest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          Yeah. The minority of loud stupid/paid people who care about this really are the ones who should be inconvenienced. If you want a gendered bathroom then there’s an outbuilding you can use. It’s on one plot so technically we’re still within code.

          • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I’m far from an expert on this, but my understanding is that that could work, but it could also fall foul of other building regs, specifically the H&S regulations of 1992, which talk about toilets being suitable and sufficient

            In my inexpert opinion it’d be enough of a grey area that you could challenge it in court if you were told it wasn’t allowed. In practical terms, no company is likely to do this unless they were specifically trying to take it to court to challenge the law or bring it more public agenda

            But it’s s good idea and I’d support any company that tried it

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      This is not a bad consequence, better for all of us, even if the trigger is fear and spite

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      As a parent of two, this is best for the kids they claim to worry about. It makes potty training much less stressful

  • GreenBottles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Why the fuck do these perverts care so much about what people do in a bathroom? How fucking weird

    • poopkins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      A female colleague proclaims often loudly how disgusting she finds it to see a male colleague leave the unisex toilet at the office. I’ve asked her if those men are leaving a mess or what specifically was disgusting, and she says she just finds it gross that a man uses the same toilet.

      I feel that the segregation is too engrained into our generation to move away from separated toilets. Honestly it’s a miracle we no longer have segregated toilets by skin color in the South.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    I was confused, but then the article was about the UK, where they stupidly did Brexit. Don’t worry, everybody. This is just about people who make dumb decisions.

    • Etterra@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      You say that, but I mean have you looked around here lately? The Bri’ish don’t have a monopoly on stupid.