• Folstar@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Maybe this is from growing up in a place with seasons, but 30C to 30F is a comfortable temperature range and I would be quite pleased to live in a place where those are the extremes.

  • mr_eckneim@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    You fuckers argued to much No more relative temperatures for you, we‘re all using kelvin now

    • nfh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Minnesotans at 30°F are a great example of direction mattering, and not just temperature; hit 30 on the way down and you’ll see them change out of shorts, but hit 30 on the way up and you’ll see them change into shorts

    • Weirdfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      When it’s 30F and sunny I’m on my snowboard in a t shirt. Course, I’m in Chicago, 30C feels like a nice cool day to do shit outside in summer.

  • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Americans have compatibility issues with the rest of the world, and it’s not getting any better - in more ways than this one.

    • Psionicsickness@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      44
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Whatever. Metric is better in pretty much every other way, but Fahrenheit is demonstrably better for describing temperature as experienced by a human.

      • D_C@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        “demonstrably better”
        Well go on then, I would like you to demonstrate to me how it is better.

      • Rothe@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It is demonstrably not. You are more familiar with it, and you loathe decimals, so you are of the personal opinion that it is. But that is all it is, your personal opinion about it.

      • TheRealKuni@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Fahrenheit is demonstrably better for describing temperature as experienced by a human.

        I used to say this exact thing. I decided to be scientific about it and test it by learning Celsius and trying it for a few months.

        I have not gone back. It has been seven years. All my devices are still reporting Celsius to me.

        I was enjoying the process just because of the novelty of learning a new temperature scale, but when I experienced my first winter with Celsius I knew I’d never go back.

        0 being freezing is so much more useful than you’d think. 23°F doesn’t really mean anything to me, but -5°C means “as far below freezing as 5°C is above freezing.” It inherently provides context without having to do math.

        Also, the degrees being “larger” makes them more meaningful and thus easier to learn.

        If you want to try what I did, here are some useful steps. First, this rhyme: “30 is hot, 20 is nice, 10 is chilly, 0 is ice.”

        More importantly, here’s the heuristic I came up with: memorize the 10s. So 10°C = 50°F, 20°C = 68°F, 30°C = 86°F (easy to remember 68 and 86 because they’re reversed). Then memorize the 5s. You can always find them because they’re 9°F off from the 10s. 25°C = 77°F for example.

        Once you have those points memorized, you can go up and down from them using 2°F per 1°C. It’s really 1.8, but since at most you’ll be 2°C away from a certain value, the most you’ll ever be off is 0.4°F. So if the weather app tells you it’s 22°C, you start at 68°F and add 4 to get to 72°F (it is actually 71.6 but who cares?). If it says 23°C, you start at 77°F and subtract 4 to get 73°F (actually 73.4, but again who cares?).

        I used this heuristic until I didn’t really need it anymore. I still use it if someone asks me the temperature, because I live in the US and no one knows Celsius. So I quickly convert and give them their Fahrenheit value. But at this point I don’t really need to do so personally.

        And like I said, I much prefer Celsius even for describing weather. It has really taught me how arbitrary both scales are. A co-worker of mine said, “Yeah but 100° sounds hot.” I replied, “The first time a colleague in India told me it was 40° outside, that sounded hot.” I didn’t need to convert it (didn’t bother memorizing that value because I never see it where I live), it just sounded hot because I knew the scale. (It’s 104°F for the record.)

        But as I touched on, I was shocked by how much the freezing point being zero mattered. It makes sub-freezing temperature values so useful. I hadn’t expected that, growing up I knew 32°F was freezing and was so used to that nonsense that I didn’t realize what I was missing until I experienced it.

        • Axolotl@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I never used F, but as a discalculic person, i am glad i don’t have because it’s harder to memorize, while C is just “Uuh 0 is ice, 100 is boiling water” and i don’t need to remember anything crazy or do any math

          • quarkquasar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Considering the inconsequential nature of small talk, “Well, water isn’t boiling, but it isn’t freezing either” should be an acceptable answer to “how’s the weather where you are?”.

            • Axolotl@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              45 minutes ago

              I don’t see your point, anyway, you are rather bold to assume i do small talks

        • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I tried the same thing, found c to be dog shit for describing air temperature. So after a year I went back. Wild how personal experience can vary so much!

          You said a lot of words to basically say fuck all that matters.

          It’s personal preference. F is objectively more fine of a scale compared to C. Which can be arguably more useful for air temp. But it’s also arguable that the extra resolution is unneeded since you can’t really tell the difference to that degree.

          Frankly both C and F are both equally beyond absolute fucking dogshit for telling how nice or bad the weather is since the quality of the weather needs more things then JUST temp to have a even remotely decent idea of what it’s like outside.

          We all just kinda assume the rest based on lived experience of the area we are actively in when talking about it day to day.

          But for example 30c in iowa vs California vs florida are LITERALLY nothing alike. At fucking all.

          30c in Germany and 30c Colorado are nothing alike.

          Humidity, altitude, cloud coverage, wind, and other factors play such a major part of of quality of the weather that arguing over the scale you use is fucking pointless.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I am so tired of this claim, it just feels that way because you are used to it, just as C feels easier to use for describing temperatures for me as I am used to that.

        It is a completely subjective definition, that you can’t judge objetively.

      • Hegar@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Fahrenheit is demonstrably better for describing temperature as experienced by a human.

        It’s just not though. F uses a wider range of numbers to describe common outside air temperature, but more numbers =/= better.

        I’ve lived in both F and C countries and farenheit is not easier, more intuitive, more sensible or better in any way. A number is a number. The extra precision of F is not super useful - no one can really feel a 1F difference. The freezing point of water does make a huge difference, so knowing above/below zero C is useful, but above/below 32F is no harder.

        This argument that F is somehow more suitable for human temperatures is something you see online, but as someone comfortable with both i can say there is functionally no difference, except that metric is compatible with the rest of the world.

        • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          As someone who has used both and grew up with both I find f to be more suitable for human temps.

          There are functional differences, your avg household machines needing set points for a thermostat are WAY fucking nicer to use F with then C. Machines frequently give way too much damn leeway when you use C resulting in inconsistent temp control. It’s god damn annoying.

          Otherwise both systems objectively fucking suck at accurately describing the weather outside.

        • Rothe@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Also they always forget that on modern digital thermometers, we have decimals, which means that the F scale doesn’t really have a wider range to describe common outside air temperature at all.

          • StumblingWasabi@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Isn’t that just not true? I mean it really couldn’t matter less since both have enough, but there are more numbers (including decimals) between 0-100 than like -20 to 30 (idk what a good C range is.)

        • doctordevice@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I strongly disagree on one key point:

          no one can really feel a 1F difference

          Yes I can. Changing my thermostat by a single degree can be very impactful on my comfort. And on the “too warm side” each additional degree is noticeably less comfortable.

          Days with highs of 68F, 69F, and 70F and comparable humidity all feel different to me. Sure, there are more factors at play but holding the rest equal, 1F differences are noticeable.

      • Instigate@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It’s interesting to me that the only people who advocate for Fahrenheit over Celsius in any circumstances are those who grew up using it, whereas those who prefer Celsius over Fahrenheit are from both places where Celsius and Fahrenheit are used. I’m yet to see an example of someone saying “I grew up with Celsius but Fahrenheit is so much better because…”

        • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I grew up with Celsius in my house and prefer fahrenheit for air temp. I use Celsius for literally everything else.

          The finer scale is nice for air temp.

          Both fucking sucks dick at describing the weather tho.

      • Folstar@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’m an American with a tenuous grasp of the C scale and even I know this is BS.

      • JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        I don’t understand how this is the case. I feel like it would only be perceived as being true by growing up with the system. Like i guess I don’t know where you grew up so I shouldn’t really make this assertion but I feel like most people from countries that use Celsius have probably never thought “hey I think it’s weird that 30 degrees is considered really hot.”

        I guess you could make the same argument that people living in the United States don’t complain about water boiling at 212 degrees but that also doesn’t address the compatibility issue

        • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          30c is a cold day tho… The fact people think 30c is hot is just fucking wild. Shit ain’t hot till 40-41c

        • ElectricTrombone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          I won’t argue which is better. But the human body thing has truth to it. He literally designed the scale around common temperatures. 100 was supposed to be human body temperature (he ended up being a little off, but close). And the 0 on the scale was found by just adding ice to salt until it stopped getting colder IIRC.

          • Rothe@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            He literally designed the scale around common temperatures.

            Common temperatures in some places. And also just because it is scaled this way doesn’t mean it is better. It serves the exact same purpose as any other way to measure temperature.

          • MrKoyun@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Also having a nice scale from 0 to 100 as “really fucking cold” and “really fucking hot” is arguably easier to understand.

            • Nythos@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Only if you grew up with it.

              0°c being the freezing temp of water makes a lot more sense to me than 32°F and so I can easily work around the scale of temperature using Celsius easier than I ever could Fahrenheit

              • MrKoyun@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Well… I didnt grow up with Fahrenheit and don’t use it but it makes sense to me 🤷‍♂️

        • kahjtheundedicated@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It’s pretty much just 0 is really cold and 100 is really hot as far as weather goes. Besides that it feels pretty arbitrary. I’m a metric stan, but I do still think Fahrenheit is pretty good for talking about the weather.

          • Saapas@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            5 hours ago

            That’s pretty damn subjective lol. At least the zero point (something important to people living in countries where it falls down to that) gives off useful info.

            • LurkingLuddite@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              5 hours ago

              All numbers are arbitrary until you relate them to reality. This whole debate is fucking stupid vibe checks on how people feel about meaningless numbers, because the temperature is the temperature whether it’s -40 or 233, or 420.

              • Saapas@piefed.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                5 hours ago

                I mean the zero point of Celsius isn’t a vibe in the same way as “pretty cold, pretty hot” or however people describe Fahrenheit. It actually means something to real life that it gets to zero or goes negative. 100C is for most people much less useful tbf.

                But mainly it’s about what you’re used ofc. I just hate the nonsense thing about Fahrenheit being better that is about vibes alone

                • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  It’s literally a vibe… 0 is an arbitrary number just as much as 32, 69 or 420 is. Your just up your own ass like most people are when it comes to C vs F. Both systems suck, both systems are fucking retarded, both systems are entirely bullshit vibes based nonsense till you give them an arbitrary attachment point to something.

                  They are literally by definition relative scales. It’s literally worthless nonsense with out a reference point. And in that regard F and C are literally the EXACT same thing. One just has a more fine scale while the other is more coarse.

                  The only scale that isn’t 100% vibes based is kelvin.

                • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  0 in F also means something very specific. Celsius isn’t any better at that. If you want something that actually means 0 at 0 then use Kelvin. If you aren’t, both have an equal basis in reality.

                  The scale of values is just better for human experience in F. It has more integer values in the range of values humans experience.

      • inari@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It’s just arbitrary numbers. It only seems better to you because you grew up with it.

      • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Which units are best doesn’t matter: the point is, nobody else uses standard units anymore, apart from a couple oddball countries, and only one of them - North Korea - isn’t trying to extricate itself from it.

        Everybody else tries to be a part of the world’s technical and scientific communities by speaking the same language, but of course America has to be different. Because of course it does… And it’s tiring if you ask me.

        • Zorque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          America does speaks metric, especially the technical and scientific communities. They just also speak standard.

          Don’t other countries get on Americans for not speaking more than one language? Why is that now a detriment?

        • ccunning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I dunno - I had to buy a mattress bed and sheets in feet in Thailand. We don’t even do that in America.

          And the steel tube was sold in inches, meters and millimeters ¯_(ツ)_/¯

        • Psionicsickness@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          8 hours ago

          And I agree with you, fully, except for temperature. “If everyone was jumping off a bridge”, right?

          The scale is stupid and I don’t give a fuck if it’s the “norm”. The norm is dumb.

          • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Norms may be dumb but they make everybody’s lives easier when everybody follows them.

            As for temperature specifically, there’s nothing inherently better in Celsius or Fahrenheit. It’s just a choice. The only unit that is superior to all of them is the Kelvin because it has a true zero, but it’s not commonly used in everyday settings.

            • Psionicsickness@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              19
              ·
              8 hours ago

              But there is something inherently better in Fahrenheit! 0 is fucking cold. 100 is goddamn hot. It’s a measure that makes sense to the perception of us, human beings.

              0 in Celsius is a little cooler than brisk, and 100 means you’ve been dead for a while. It’s a dumb system for humans to use.

                • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  Sure if we are cooking, doing chemistry or anything else that directly involves liquids and doesn’t need extremely specific values that Celsius isn’t equip to handle.

                  The only real difference between f and c is how fine the scale is. That’s it. Literally the ONLY functional difference.

                  If you dont need a finer scale then F has no benefits over C and they are entirely equal.

                  And realistically if your getting into precision just use fucking kelvin.

                  Both F and C objectively suck ass equally. Honestly the only time in my life I’ve found F or C to better is when I need to set the temp on a thermostat. F on cheap thermostats is more reliable as it has less leeway before it kicks on/off. Resulting in a more consistent air temperature.

                  C tends to drift more above and below the set point. But nicer thermostats tend to not have that issue anyways. So it’s a moot point most of the time.

  • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    30c is fucking cold tho… That’s still hoodie weather. The fuck do you mean you think that’s hot?!

    We don’t even start to get to “God damn it’s hot out” till around 41-42c with 85-90% humidity

    • LwL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Nah 30c is “i wish it was socially acceptable to just walk around naked because I am fucking dying in a t shirt and shorts” weather.

      40 is just that but worse

      I hope I never have to experience high humidity 40 I might just keel over and die

      30f is viable for shorts but only with a thick-ish jacket on upper body

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I think you have it confused with -30C which is when put on a hoodie because the t-shirt isn’t enough anymore.

    • lonefighter@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      And 30 F isn’t really that cold. Throw a hoodie on or maybe a light jacket.

      I wish it were 30 F right now. I’m ready for summer to be over.

  • Signtist@bookwyr.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 hours ago

    That’s why I’m glad I live where I’m more likely to complain about it being -40.

  • blarghly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Hot take: F is the superior temperature measurement for real people. If you are a scientist in a lab, sure, maybe referencing the state changes in water is useful for you somehow.

    But for a normal person, 90% of the use of tempertature measurements is knowing what clothes to wear, and the other 10% is for setting oven temperatures. Oven temperatures are far hotter than waters boiling point, so F and C are equialvalently useful.

    For knowing how to dress, however, F clearly has the advantage, as the numbers map to obvious temperature ranges. Ie,

    100F = really fuckin hot
    0F = really fuckin cold

    • Rothe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      110 = really fucking hot

      -10 = really fucking cold.

      Yeah, really useful scale.

      It is useful because you are used to it, it has no inherent better qualities over any other scale.

      • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Eh -10 with no wind is shorts weather.

        Temp is by it self an ass way to tell what to wear. You need wind humidity and temp to even remotely get an accurate idea.

        • Axolotl@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Eh -10 with no wind is shorts weather.

          Are you from mars? That’s fucking cold 😭

      • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’m not a water elemental for one. And two I ain’t cooking or doing chemistry.

        So it’s a fucking worthless and useless data point.

        F and C are both stupid relative scales that are equally shit for the exact same reasons. And neither are any better then the other. They both fucking suck. Just use the one every else around you uses so you are understood and arnt that asshole in the room being obtuse because you think your better then everyone else.

        Unless yer giving the wind chill and humidity too, air temp is fucking pointless anyways.

        Just say it’s hot, cold, nice out. It’s good e fucking nuff

    • mr_eckneim@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Does the water outside not freeze at 0°C? Because that seems to be pretty useful info as in there‘s ice outside or not