• JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Parental controls: exist

    Law makers: But what if we made people submit really sensitive information instead of requiring websites to identify themselves as adult for the purpose of content filters?

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      What, parents actually parenting and monitoring what their children do? Talking with them about being online?

      Granted I say this sarcastically and then mom and dad both fall for AI garbage on Facebook yet again so maybe I should rethink that they are even capable of having a discussion on critical thinking

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The irony being this sort of thing will make people more used to sharing very sensitive information online and more likely to fall for phishing attempts. Like the parents who couldn’t figure out parental controls in the first place probably are.

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    To save costs on VPN services, Rsync the wank bank for all your mates to share. This month it’s Daves turn so expect lots of scat but I did put in a request for incest too.

  • JumpyWombat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    191
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The problem is that once it will be normal to request IDs for porn, the same will be extended to everything else with excuses like “let’s do it for the kids” or “if you don’t have anything to hide…”.

    VPNs… yeah sure, until there will be a crackdown on those too.

      • Owl@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        China doesn’t want to

        Just like the US gov not catching drug lords when they do stupid stuff

          • redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            Remote work/administration too. I work on servers one of which is behind the chinese firewall, via ssh. ssh can carry socks natively, I could build a crude throttled but working vpn in seconds.

            China is also slowing transfers in general, I guess to push domestic providers and servers. Even with that if they don’t want to sever all economic and scientific connections it will remain possible, though cumbersome to most.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          They don’t turn a blind eye. It’s just that the VPN’s that work through China’s firewall do so over ports that the entire internet uses, like 443 (https). They could filter everything, but it’d be a loooot more resource intensive to filter all internet traffic by destination/content instead of only doing that with extra ports that extra services like VPNs normally use.

          … and as others have pointed out, there ARE valid reasons to allow some VPNs. Forcing them to jump through hoops to function is no skin off their back, while properly filtering all traffic would be disasterous for them beyond the expense.

        • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          There are too many ways around it to viably block VPNs and Tor. Both offer bridge services that don’t look like VPNs and can come from different places.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      My VPN is in Switzerland, they have strong protective laws, for now.

      Guess we’ll all have to download and prepare to share!?!

  • cRazi_man@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    Saw a comment saying the ID process accepts any ol’ ID sample pic you find from a quick image search online.

  • 5too@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m all for VPN services, but I seem to recall some sketchy things about Proton in particular - anyone have any alternatives they like?

      • 𝕛𝕨𝕞-𝕕𝕖𝕧@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        mullvad is good for most casual users but if you want to do anything technical i’d steer clear.

        you can’t forward the ports anymore in mullvad. don’t get me wrong, they did it as a measure to reduce the volume of CSAM and other trauma-inducing imagery their administrators had to deal with and i totally respect that reasoning. people get legitimate PTSD moderating and administrating certain platforms/services.

        just a shame torrenting gets made harder for everyone because of a handful of despicable individuals.

        • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          The reason they disabled this was it was a possible privacy leak. This means if you are using a VPN that enables port forwarding, you might be at risk.

          • 𝕛𝕨𝕞-𝕕𝕖𝕧@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            well yeah forwarding your VPN’s ports is a possible leak… that’s the point of opening the ports?

            i think it’s only a privacy risk if you don’t understand the network stack and don’t understand what using port forwarding on a VPN entails so that you can take proper precautions.

            regardless, it’s fair that most users would be at risk just wantonly fucking with settings they don’t understand. probably not a valid justification to limit services but i can see the business rationale.

            anyway not disagreeing with you or anything i had just read the mullvad team disabled port forwarding because they were experiencing distress/PTSD dealing with the administrative and legal issues that arose due to the way some of their user base chose to use the service, and they decided removing port forwarding would be a reasonable way to target and cut down this type of traffic without affecting most users. privacy leaks might have been mentioned somewhere but ig i just hadn’t seen it. not exactly a mullvad expert, myself lol.

            i dont use VPN services like mullvad anymore, though. don’t really trust the big VPN companies and prefer running my own hardware and nodes.

      • M137@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Really? It’s been widely reported. But Proton has spent a lot of time and money to get seen by users who wouldn’t have heard about the negative stuff. Even here on Lemmy the amount of pro-proton posts has gone up a lot since the bad stuff came out, it’s pretty blatant.

      • 5too@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Here’s what I was remembering; the Proton CEO had praise for some of the new Trump admin’s anti-trust statements last January, and seemed to support them more generally.

        What ended up happening with that? It looked like he tried to walk it back, and maybe didn’t intend for that to use the official Proton account?

            • lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Well, thanks for the context. I still hate the tweet. The tweet itself didn’t promote a specific nom – it promoted Republicans

              • jsomae@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                21 hours ago

                To steelman him for a sec – just as it’s good to call out your own team when they do something wrong, it’s also a virtue in many people’s minds to acknowledge when the other side does something good. You can say the rules are different if the other side are fascists and we just have to punch them, but (a) I don’t think that it was clear to everybody in the first weeks of Trump’s presidency exactly how fascist things were going to be (this was when he’d gotten ceasefires don’t forget) and (b) I still wouldn’t consider it a cancellable offence either way, even if it’s misguided liberal behaviour.

                Anyway, such behaviour tracks with being a liberal, and I’m not at the point yet where I’m wanting to cancel people for being liberals.

            • 5too@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Okay, thanks for the context. I caught the initial blowup when I was looking at VPN options originally, but never heard any of the follow-up.

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Listen man. There are no non sketchy VPN there never has been there never ever will be. Period. All you can do is the least worst one and that is proton today. Might be someone else tomorrow. If anyone tries to tell you anything different they are a liar or ignorant.

  • MyNamesTotallyRobert@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    For most of world history UK has kind of been among the worst countries in the world. They were committing atrocities in the name of preserving religious ideals before nazis were even a thing. Their leadership has been starving their citizens while the monarchy lives with lavish excess since before north korea ever existed. Committing war crimes used to be as commonplace back in the day as afternoon tea.

    How the UK somehow fell into public favor online seems like an anomaly to me. They got attacked during WW2 and then weren’t communists during the cold war. Big woop-de-doo. People usually speak highly of UK online but any time they’re in the news it’s because they’re doing something truly awful (recently moving towards establishing a regime of online censorship on par with that of China’s).

    I am shocked whenever I see people reacting to something shitty the UK is doing like its some kind of unprecedented unexpected event. They’ve been doing this type of shit for THE LAST THOUSAND YEARS. All I’m saying is they deserve A LOT more hate than they currently get.