• FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    He’s a piece of shit, and his greed comes at the expense of the public good.

    And that he worked to 96, with one of the most monumental fortunes in human history, just goes to show what a greedy, careless, unfeeling motherfucker he is.

    • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      My guess is he’s received news he’ll be dead within a year and this is just them executing the succession plan.

      Meaning he is only stepping down to protect the weath fund becuase preserving his pile of dragon gold is the most important thing to him.

      Whereas for the rest of us, the most important thing he’ll ever do is die as is true for any billionaire. May his son soon do what’s best for us all.

  • VeryVito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    ·
    16 hours ago

    He may be one of the least evil of the billionaires, but a 96-year-old handing the reigns of a $1T company over to his 71-year-old son really sums up how well trickle-down economics works for the rest of us.

    • SippyCup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’ve worked for a handful of Berkshire owned companies. They are by far the worst employers in my area. If you manage to get past entry level some of the benefits are nice, but none of them compare to the entry level benefits at the worst union jobs I’ve had.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        he is know to play it safe with his companies, unlike most other billionaires, who gather negative public perceptions really quick.

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Sure there are degrees of evilness. Musk is certainly more evil than buffet. Both can still be evil though.

  • postman@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I don’t think he’s the “owner” of Apple and Coca-cola.

    (Edit: I believe the title was edited to include the word ‘major’)