He may be one of the least evil of the billionaires, but a 96-year-old handing the reigns of a $1T company over to his 71-year-old son really sums up how well trickle-down economics works for the rest of us.
I’ve worked for a handful of Berkshire owned companies. They are by far the worst employers in my area. If you manage to get past entry level some of the benefits are nice, but none of them compare to the entry level benefits at the worst union jobs I’ve had.
He may be one of the least evil of the billionaires, but a 96-year-old handing the reigns of a $1T company over to his 71-year-old son really sums up how well trickle-down economics works for the rest of us.
I’ve worked for a handful of Berkshire owned companies. They are by far the worst employers in my area. If you manage to get past entry level some of the benefits are nice, but none of them compare to the entry level benefits at the worst union jobs I’ve had.
he is know to play it safe with his companies, unlike most other billionaires, who gather negative public perceptions really quick.
By definition they are evil
They didn’t said not evil. Least evil is still evil.
But he can be among the least evil. There are certainly degrees.
No such thing.
Sure there are degrees of evilness. Musk is certainly more evil than buffet. Both can still be evil though.