• Thteven@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I think it’s about half-assed gay representation. Like they just slap “gay” on a character and that’s their entire personality. Is that what you mean about checklist diversity?

      • ShaunaTheDead@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I get why people are critical of rainbow washing but when the fake support disappeared after Trump was elected it was really scary to see how fragile the movement is. So personally, I’ll take someone trying and failing at representation over nothing.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          so you’d rather be lied to and told everything is “o-gay” instead of them showing who they really are and you get to choose who you support?

          • ShaunaTheDead@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I think when there’s implicit consensus on a topic, it disempowers people who disagree from speaking out openly. Anytime someone speaks out, there’s always a chance that anyone sitting on the fence would agree with them. I think that while rainbow washing was a flimsy shield, it was still a shield against bigotry because of the implied consensus of support and the disempowering of bigots from speaking out and potentially swaying anyone still on the fence.

          • criss_cross@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Not a gay person but generally people usually prefer people try to be nice rather than openly hostile.

          • ShaunaTheDead@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I think when there’s implicit consensus on a topic, it disempowers people who disagree from speaking out openly. Anytime someone speaks out, there’s always a chance that anyone sitting on the fence would agree with them. I think that while rainbow washing was a flimsy shield, it was still a shield against bigotry because of the implied consensus of support and the disempowering of bigots from speaking out and potentially swaying anyone still on the fence.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    dude… I fuckin hate this shit.

    for the past decade when I called it out I got called homophobic.

    fuck the haters. if you’re going to bother mentioning the character is gay you better damn well show it and not just fucking use it as a cheap plot device.

    • LurkingLuddite@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, be careful what you ask for, because some dumb execs will take “show it” as, “make this character the biggest gay cliche that ever existed”, which … is harmful representation I’d say.

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        i mean i’ve met a few dozen of that dude just doing music. my experience is they tend to stop being as flagrant about their cliches, they just get more quiet. which fuck that, be who you are. if you’re a walking cliche (like me) sometimes it’s nice to see other walking cliches.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’d prefer that over it being meaningless.

        This is a world where everyone is extremely accepting, no one cares this character is gay and they act the exact same as every other character but… let’s remind the audience they’re gay at every turn and it’s somehow a disadvantage that never comes up.

        It’s like when a girl character is written like a boy. Why make the distinction if it’s not something the person being represented can relate to?

        • DeLancre@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’d prefer that over it being meaningless.

          Folks, I think we found that mysterious target audience behind “Star Trek: Discovery”