• HorreC@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Just get rid of the wifi on board and give me more USB with those lanes. If people want that (and I am sure, but it seems weird on a board that also has double nics and one is 10G) just let them have a shared lane resource small m.2 (b/g) so they can add a plug in card, which also doesnt rule them out from the next big thing if you really like to be on the newest gen wifi/bluetooth stuff.

  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I got a big usb hub and stopped caring about this.

    Having the ports at the front of my desk where I can plug things in and out more easily is nicer, too.

    Obviously some stuff benefits from being plugged in “directly” but most things don’t. In normal use you almost never max out what a single port can do.

    • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      Oh hell no!

      I’m a big usb-c fan, because it has a lot of advantages over usb-a like more data speed and power throughput.

      But usb-a also has advantages over usb-c: much stronger connector and much cheaper.

      For things like a mouse and keyboard, the advantages of usb-c are worthless, but the advantages of usb-a are not.

      • tobebannedbygaymods@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 minutes ago

        still doesn’t make sense , the USB-C supports USB-A on both sides so if one breaks a simple flip would solve it as for physical strength , how ,much weight are you putting on there ? I only support USB-A connector because I got older tech and refuse to replace been mine for 20+ years and still usable and I’m used to it

      • fork@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Ain’t no integrated graphics pushing all that shit. But at this point, it’s the only thing available. 😂

        • OR3X@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Onboard graphics these days can certainly push 3-4 monitors, but you ain’t gonna be playing any games on it. At least nothing demanding. Could probably play stuff from the early 2000’s and before. Which, I mean, who needs anything else? Halo CE, my beloved…

          • remotelove@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Bonded ethernet ports are for redundancy and concurrency, which is not quite additional bandwidth. (Just calling that out to help squash any misconceptions of how bonding works. It is technically more bandwidth, but you won’t see total throughput of the two links unless you are transferring multiple files.)

        • FrederikNJS@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          The bonding I guess is fair game… But a bit odd if you only have a 2.5g and 1g ports… You would probably want those symmetrical.

          But separate networks? Have you considered VLANs?

        • Dave@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Once you’ve bonded what do you use that speed for? There’s no way my hard drive can handle 3.5G write speed.

          • Im_old@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            See raid0 (but be safe and do raid 1+0). Also maybe it’s a server, so read speed is more important (usually).

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    They have to account for the fact that not everybody can afford new peripherals. There’s only so many converters and adapters us poors can cram back there.

    • clif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      What’s the advantage of DP over HDMI? I see the ports more frequently these days but rarely see monitors that take direct DP input… Mostly HDMI.

      I keep having to buy DP->HDMI converters

      • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Mostly HDMI

        That is because of lobbying. The reality is that HDMI has loyalties and isn’t a free standard like display port is. Display port is also superior technologically: it is compatible with usb-c (thunderbolt), supports higher framerate, and has higher quality (up to 16K).

  • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Yeah, that top image is a fantasy.

    I currently have three USB ports, and one of them is used for power. 😭

      • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        16x USB 4, 1x 10 GbE, 4x SFP-DD, 2x HDMI, 2x DP, 2x GPMI. Oh, and a couple XLRs for audio connectivity. It’s really not much we’re asking for here.

    • Caveman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      You need a much better chipset to support 3.0 speeds on all of them at the same time. If you want to share speeds a well made usb hub will do.

      In reality most people go for the cheaper option and focus more on RAM pcie and CPU features.