• Cocopanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Woooooh. Musks security team is a gold mine. They will forever be employed because of this dudes stupidity.

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Alternatives would be great! My only concern is the number of satellites that have to be continually launched while older satellites are burned up after just five years. That’s thousands of satellites per service provider having to be continually replaced. Seems wasteful, but maybe I’m thinking the resource usage is greater than it really is in the grand scheme of things.

      • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        That five year figure is the time it takes to deorbit if the satellite goes dead, not the lifespan, from my understanding.

      • kebab@endlesstalk.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Well if Europe doesn’t do this, US or China will regardless and they won’t care about leaving junk in the space. So it’s a matter of who will profit off that. And also, the EU is doing a lot for the environment already. Maybe it’s time for other countries like India to stop throwing trash directly into rivers now? We live on the same planet. Even if EU achieves the zero-emission state, it only accounts for 5% of the population in the world, so it won’t change that much on a global scale if other countries continue refusing to cooperate

    • RandAlThor@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Honestly, someone hurry up and launch an alternative! Chinese are setting up one but I wouldn’t trust them either.

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 minutes ago

        The French government just invested a load of money in Eutelsat to kickstart this about a month or so ago

      • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I think they should be taken down or taken over by another entity. They were launched under the premise they were a utility and it turns out they’re being used military.

        I dont mean the internet access itself but the giving and striping of access to suit a military agenda goes beyond the pervue of an organization claiming to be an ISP or commercial utility.

      • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Can’t even watch porn with Chinese internet, westerners won’t survive a day on using that internet without a VPN.

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            yup, they moved to PROXIES, and anti-detect browsers much like reddits getting more sophisticated detection, china is always trying to find a way to detect these methods. from what ive heard on the same forum that ban evades reddit.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This is a perfect example of why we have to confiscate the bulk of the fortunes of Sociopathic Oligarchs.

    We have this guy operating his own foreign policy in a very sensitive war with nuclear weapons in the mix. The rest of the world shouldn’t have to be at the mercy of his arrogance and hubris, waiting for him to get bored with this game, and move onto the next one, hopefully before he blows up the planet.

    He has been proven to be massive national and global security threat, who will only become more dangerous as he hoards more money. Just strip his citizenship, confiscate his money and his companies, and deport him to South Africa. Then use his example as a threat to other Sociopathic Oligarchs.

  • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Oh, I remember hearing about this in 2022. There was a ton of speculation about this. I’m glad it’s been confirmed.

    Hoping one day the MuskRat finds himself behind bars.

    • NotKyloRen@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      15 hours ago

      When I pointed out the first time this happened, I was pummeled in the comments by people saying that he just doesn’t want to be complicit in anything. Okay, but then why did he give Ukraine a bunch of Starlink receivers to begin with? And now this is the second or third time he’s fucked the Ukrainians by turning off the service as they’re taking back their land.

      He a fucking clown. He wants his service used, but he doesn’t want any consequences. He just wants to drag the war out and add “Powered by Starlink”. He’s given himself some control over the conflict, while enriching himself for as long as it continues.

      • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yeah, I wasn’t really sure of his reasoning here, but I don’t think it was very good to begin with.

        Unfortunately, we already know that he has way too much power for a private citizen.

        I think in 2022, he still had some fans, he hadn’t quite ruined his image all the way yet, even though most of us could see the writing on the wall. It sucks you got jumped for that, though.

        I’m in the “We should Nationalize Starlink without giving him a dime” camp as recompense for this crime.

      • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        why did he give Ukraine a bunch of Starlink receivers

        Because those receivers were “free” for the Ukrainians but someone else paid millions for that

        Imagine paying $500/month for each “free” receiver because “military applications needs maximum quality” but when the vatnik CEO gets a call from its owner "oh no today it glitched!”

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        He likely wants to blackmail Ukraine with it. I now have some guess why the anti-anti-corruption bill was made…

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        I was going to say there’s no rules against saying “Elon Musk should be killed” here on Lemmy, but then I saw we’re on Lemmy.world, and I think they’re trying to be the new Reddit.

        (For any mods, this is not a call for violence, simply stating a thing that isn’t allowed. Please read it again if you think I made a call to violence.)

        • Eldritch@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Bob and Doug, from Second City television.

          Didn’t want anyone to think it was cultural misappropriation or rocking and our neighbors to north. If there ever was a truer hoser than musk I’m not sure who it is

            • Eldritch@piefed.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Heh well now that you pointed it out. Auto correct strikes again, as well as being distracted lol

            • Eldritch@piefed.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              13 hours ago

              But it’s such a good word lol.

              I legitimately grew up watching SCTV and it’s one movie spinoff. Saturday night live was good back then too. But damn that SCTV cast was epic. Moranis, Thomas, Radner, Flaherty, Leve, Short, Candy and of course O’hara

              • k0e3@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 hours ago

                I wonder if it’s a generational thing. I grew up in Ottawa in the 90s and I don’t recall ever using it. I knew the word but it just wasn’t an everyday word for my group of friends.

                • Eldritch@piefed.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  Likely generational and possibly regional. There are similar things in the US. Hell honestly it may have never been a real thing on any scale.

  • floo@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Huh, I didn’t have ‘war criminal’ on my list of Shitty Things Musk Is. Let’s just add that right below ‘Proud Nazi’

  • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Normally, I would have advocated for the nationalization of Starlink and SpaceX as a matter of national and global security, but it’s not like the current American regime would do any better. I’m not going to be counting on them to investigate, let alone prosecute the affairs of this Russian junkie-stooge either.

    • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      84
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Regardless of who would do better, the entirety of SpaceX and Starlink were paid for using American taxpayer’s money and government contracts. We already paid for it, we should own it.

      • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Ohh, just wait till they privatize weather, mail, prison. hospitals…

        It’s gonna be too expensive to live on this planet for YOU.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Two of those are literally already privatised in America, and one more took some significant steps in that direction earlier this year.

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            one more took some significant steps in that direction earlier this year.

            One? Last I checked, both weather and mail are both on their way to privatization.

            • Zagorath@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Damn, mail too? That didn’t make international headlines the way shutting down the weather service did.

    • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      73
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Brain dead take honestly. Nationalization doesn’t work out 11 times out of 10. Look at NASA, SpaceX ran circles around them with a tini tiny fraction of the funding.

      Nationalization does not mean it belongs to “us” it belongs to the government, an entity with motivations, incentives and desires different from “us” the people.

      • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        59
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Could you elaborate on how SpaceX “ran circles around NASA”, seeing as how NASA basically pioneered every single piece of modern space technology, and all SpaceX is doing is fumbling to rearrange it like Legos that explode on the launch pad? Lol

        • philpo@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Not only that,but NASA gave this knowledge away for free - to the universities that taught the people who now work for Muskler.

          • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Yeah. These dumbasses forget that government funding is what originally set the stage and enabled any progress at all for private company-entrepreneurs who benefitted from all that publicly available knowledge, paid for by our tax dollars.

            Innovation will slow to a trickle with all these government cuts because these companies literally can’t pay for anything not directly related to their bottom dollar, and none of them can see far enough past next quarter’s profits to invest in the future.

              • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Human knowledge is always cumulative ya dunce.

                Human knowledge can be (and historically, often has been) destroyed as well as accumulated. It’s a myth originating with the Whigs that history always moved in the direction of progress. As recent political events in the US have shown, that’s not true.

                nationalization doesn’t work, and it has never worked

                Except, for example, in every developed-world health care delivery system, all of which massively outperform the private-sector US system both on cost and on outcomes. Likewise, fire departments, interstate highway systems, public water supplies, armies, etc, etc.

                So before calling someone a dunce, you might do well to learn more about the many things you don’t know.

                • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  12 hours ago

                  Well I never said anything about progress, I said it’s cumulative. We never destroy more than we have accumulated. None of the knowledge we have today would exist without the knowledge of our earliest of ancestors when Homo sapiens was still thousands of years away. That being said, looking at the sheer amount of time we’ve been accumulating knowledge even if we had a thousand years of absolute barbarity and massive ignorance, the statement that knowledge tends towards progress would still be true. The present is a blip in the scale of human history.

                  To address your other point. Yes I’ll admit that I was too universalistic in my argument in the heat of the moment so to speak. But the big caveat is that it does not necessarily lead to, and most always doesn’t lead to better service for end user. It’s a trade off in most cases. But I’ll never argue in favor of privatized healthcare or education for example. The loss in efficiency is simply not enough to justify the real human cost of the alternative. But cutting edge technology that is not essential, such as space travel, computers etc, belong in the private market where the right incentives to make improvements exist.

              • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                13 hours ago

                The whole point is that SpaceX’s contributions have been minimal… and have still been paid for by tax dollars anyways with all the contracts they’re getting. Their big thing is supposed to be reusable rockets… guess what, NASA already pioneered the concept of reusable spacecraft with their space shuttle.

                • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  12 hours ago

                  https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20200001093/downloads/20200001093.pdf

                  I’m just gonna reply to everyone with this, since it drives my point home and comes from NASA themselves. You can read it or not if you want, but my point is that SpaceX reduced costs in a way NASA by itself was not capable of doing. The main reason as you might imagine is the proper incentives were not there in the same way that they exist for private industry. Look at Section 3 point B. Institutional causes and cures of very high space launch cost.

          • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I think you severely discount NASA’s achievements. I would wager the stagnation of NASA and the subsequent rise of SpaceX was largely due to a lack of funding for NASA and waning public interest and lack of leadership.

            I doubt the public would have tolerated the idea blowing up rockets until it worked as a good use of tax payer dollars. So did NASA fail us, or did the public fail NASA?

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Think objectively about things, don’t just say things to echo the hivemind.

            Fuck off with the notion that everything that contradicts your opinion is the “hivemind.” It is supremely condescending and toxic to pretend you’re the only one capable of independent thought.

            • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              13 hours ago

              Did I ever say or imply that everything that contradicts my opinion is of the hive mind? Because I don’t think I did. But this particular trope of trying to flatten any of the achievements of Musk’s companies simply because they are associated with him and calling for their nationalization is a tiresome talking point of the online “left” that simply parrots whatever everyone else “on their side” is supposed to think because it has leftie vibes. It’s as brain dead a take as any you would find on a Magatard community.

              And I do need to point out that nationalization is not inherently socialist or left wing at all.

          • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            They keep giving contracts to SpaceX because that’s the way the budgets are mandated from congress. They have X amount of money to distribute. Everything goes to generally the lowest bidder, and because there are only a handful of options, they have to keep using one contractor to produce their parts because it’s even more expensive to keep switching.

            So drop the attitude. Usually the worst bidder gets the job, and it ends up costing more money after everything is said and done.

      • moakley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I actually am skeptical of nationalization. I think the free market is more efficient in most situations.

        But if you think SpaceX is running circles around NASA, well that’s so ridiculous that I’m starting to doubt myself.

        • BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Judging by the way they spelled “teeny,” I can’t help but wonder if they might also be familiar with the Cyrillic alphabet

        • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          El problema principal de estúpidos como tú es asumir que puedes inferir absolutamente nada de la persona detrás de un username en una plataforma total y absolutamente anónima. Cara de cabron huelebicho.

  • nthavoc@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    At some point, someone’s going to figure out where that on/off button is and turn the tables around on him. History dictates you can only piss so many people off.

  • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    16 hours ago

    He sees the Russian oligarchs, basically medieval duchies where they’re a law unto themselves (unless they piss off papa Putin, then it’s out the window) and thinks that’s a pretty neat deal.

  • rickdg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    For everything that Musk touches there has to be some alternative.

  • Dragomus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    This was already known back then, but it is good to bring it to the front again.

    I do kind of wonder if this is a “revenge” article against Musk for him firing up the epstein “debate” on his twitter posting spree.

    • NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The Kherson episode is distinct from an earlier report of an incident that purportedly occurred that same September, involving Crimea just to the south, and raised concerns about Musk’s ability to influence the conflict in Ukraine.