Why are you assuming Weidel will be the one? I’d venture a guess that she’s not “compatible” enough with family values of the AFD because of her homosexuality.
Höcke is still there and he’s as fanatic and a straight male.
Alice Weidel, current leader of the German nazi party. A lesbian, married to an immigrant from Sri Lanka, who has 2 kids she adopted, leading a party that is against gay marriage, immigration and same sex couples raising children and the stupid nazis don’t see any issue with that and still vote for her. Also she is living in Switzerland, so she won’t be affected by her own policies.
It’s kind of surreal. Like Kathleen “Put a chick in it and make her gay” Kennedy is running a remake of the third reich.
We see the apparent contradiction as absurd, ironic, or paradoxical cognitive dissonance.
For them it is an advantage to have a “token” minority in charge, because it gives an excuse for others like her to think “I am one of the good ones”. It’s a sly way to facilitate submission and gain support among less-likely demographics. It’s thought-terminating exceptionalism as a path of lesser resistance.
He claimed control because the then CDU+SPD were sure they could control him.
Basically same same with today’s CDU, nothing really changed, apart from the Führers gender.
But they have a lesson from the past.
Which they refuse to acknowledge.
Why are you assuming Weidel will be the one? I’d venture a guess that she’s not “compatible” enough with family values of the AFD because of her homosexuality. Höcke is still there and he’s as fanatic and a straight male.
But hey, leopard, face.
are you saying merkle is hitler?
How is Merkel relevant to this.
when you say
then you are talking about CDU having some female führer, no?
who are you talking about if not merkel?
Alice Weidel, current leader of the German nazi party. A lesbian, married to an immigrant from Sri Lanka, who has 2 kids she adopted, leading a party that is against gay marriage, immigration and same sex couples raising children and the stupid nazis don’t see any issue with that and still vote for her. Also she is living in Switzerland, so she won’t be affected by her own policies.
It’s kind of surreal. Like Kathleen “Put a chick in it and make her gay” Kennedy is running a remake of the third reich.
We see the apparent contradiction as absurd, ironic, or paradoxical cognitive dissonance.
For them it is an advantage to have a “token” minority in charge, because it gives an excuse for others like her to think “I am one of the good ones”. It’s a sly way to facilitate submission and gain support among less-likely demographics. It’s thought-terminating exceptionalism as a path of lesser resistance.
Never said the CDU had a Führer. The CDU just enabled the nsdap.
So no, I’m not talking about Merkel. I’m talking about the nsdap’s equivalent. Which is not the cdu .
ah, ok. thanks for clarifying