• bort@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    when you say

    Basically same same with today’s CDU, nothing really changed, apart from the Führers gender.

    then you are talking about CDU having some female führer, no?

    who are you talking about if not merkel?

    • AgentRocket@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      who are you talking about if not merkel?

      Alice Weidel, current leader of the German nazi party. A lesbian, married to an immigrant from Sri Lanka, who has 2 kids she adopted, leading a party that is against gay marriage, immigration and same sex couples raising children and the stupid nazis don’t see any issue with that and still vote for her. Also she is living in Switzerland, so she won’t be affected by her own policies.

      It’s kind of surreal. Like Kathleen “Put a chick in it and make her gay” Kennedy is running a remake of the third reich.

      • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        We see the apparent contradiction as absurd, ironic, or paradoxical cognitive dissonance.

        For them it is an advantage to have a “token” minority in charge, because it gives an excuse for others like her to think “I am one of the good ones”. It’s a sly way to facilitate submission and gain support among less-likely demographics. It’s thought-terminating exceptionalism as a path of lesser resistance.

    • OhneHose@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Never said the CDU had a Führer. The CDU just enabled the nsdap.

      So no, I’m not talking about Merkel. I’m talking about the nsdap’s equivalent. Which is not the cdu .