Hi all,

I am trying to find out if there is interest in a hosted Forgejo service with a strong emphasis on EU sovereignty and independence from big tech. Forgejo is an open-source Git hosting platform that I think is great and deserves wider use. For that reason, we will donate 5% of our plan revenue to the Forgejo project.

The plan is to cover what developers and small teams need:

  • Forgejo for Git hosting
  • Servers at Scaleway (a European cloud provider)
  • CI/CD runners
  • Dependency vulnerability alerts on every plan
  • Daily backups
  • Other essentials, as listed on our features page

Vault42 (that’s us) has no US parent company and uses only EU-based subprocessors, so your code stays outside US jurisdiction. ISO 27001 certification is a goal for later on.

The focus will be on private repositories, since Codeberg already serves open-source projects very well. There will also be a free plan for open source with unlimited public repositories, not to compete with Codeberg but to give people another option.

If this interests you, you can join the waitlist at vault42.eu.

Questions and suggestions are welcome in the comments or by DM.

Cheers,

Marijn from Vault42

Disclosure: I am the founder of Vault42.

  • anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Having european alternatives is great but honestly for private repos I’d rather just spin up a Forgejo instance myself on my own hardware.

    • lauha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      While I’d like to spin my own hardware, I still have to pay for external service to punch through my ISP’s NAT and access my server from outside. I also have to buy external backups from someone and all this costs pile up and running my own server is prohibitively expensive compared to just using codeberg.

      • anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Ah, neither my office nor my home is plagued by cgnat. That would certainly make a difference in options.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        And wireguard and duplicati/proxmox-backup don’t get you there?

        You know the community: they’d love to help you set up any of those. ;-)

        • lauha@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Can wireguard alone let me access my servwr from outside the NAT without having an external server?

          Does duplicati have free tier for external backups?

          • IanTwenty@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            If by ISP NAT you mean you never have a unique external IP for your ISPs router then no, wireguard does nothing for you there.

        • Marijn - Vault42 EU@europe.pubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Was about to suggest something like Netbird (also uses Wireguard), which has free tier I believe. Also using that myself for some instances I don’t need public facing.

    • BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Exactly. Since Vault42’s market appears to be corporate clients, its sole value proposition then is to handle the infrastructure a company would have maintain otherwise, is it?

      • Marijn - Vault42 EU@europe.pubOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Pretty much and by large, yes, compared with self-hosting: we run the servers, upgrades, backups and CI. Compared with GitHub or GitLab.com, the difference is jurisdiction: no US parent company, and most importantly, no Cloud Act, and only EU subprocessors.

        Vault42 is meant for people who want both, for mainly freelancers, small agencies and small teams without anyone to spare for running such infrastructure.

    • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      That’s what I do as well. There’s interest (in a Github alternative) from my side and that’s why I already spun up my own Forgejo instance. So I’m fine. I suppose the perspective here is skewed, though. There’s probably also people who don’t selfhost.