The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to memes@lemmy.world · 4 days agoNever let it connect, btw... no matter how nicely it asks.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square227linkfedilinkarrow-up1969arrow-down119
arrow-up1950arrow-down1imageNever let it connect, btw... no matter how nicely it asks.lemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to memes@lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square227linkfedilink
minus-squareArtemis_Mystique@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·3 days agoI truly despise that we stopped innovating on CRTs when flat panels came along.
minus-squareSirLeToet@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoCRTs had flatscreens beat until less than a decade ago, which was nearly 20 years after being replaced by society. Higher resolutions, refreshrates and lower latency until the 4k 250fps+ race began. However, i doubt there is much more to gain due to CRT being well into the end of the development S-curve.
minus-squareculprit@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 days agoThere was some hype for nanotube display tech about 20 years ago that was closer to CRTs in picture quality and responsiveness. Unfortunately it seems like LCD/LED has won out over any other tech so far. https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/motorola-builds-nanotube-based-display/
I truly despise that we stopped innovating on CRTs when flat panels came along.
CRTs had flatscreens beat until less than a decade ago, which was nearly 20 years after being replaced by society.
Higher resolutions, refreshrates and lower latency until the 4k 250fps+ race began.
However, i doubt there is much more to gain due to CRT being well into the end of the development S-curve.
There was some hype for nanotube display tech about 20 years ago that was closer to CRTs in picture quality and responsiveness. Unfortunately it seems like LCD/LED has won out over any other tech so far.
https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/motorola-builds-nanotube-based-display/