Another in a long proud line of weddings being bombed by America.
The wedding was 2 weeks away from development of a nuclear weapon! 🫲🍊🫱
Reports were firm they had yellow cakes.
Killing innocent civillians is a national past-time in the US.
i really, really wanted to argue with your point, but i just heard a car backfire outside my house and i knew it was a very loud car backfire and not a gunshot because there bang didn’t boom just so. also because at my old place, my neighbor is a mechanic and still has the 60’s mustang he drove in high school (i think. maybe 70’s. SHE’S BLUE OKAY) in show condition and he’d never stand for a backfire like that, president of the car club would take away his keys.
anyways this town has gotten a hell of a lot safer (it’s not an out and out gang war like it was in the 90s) so i’m about as worried about gun violence as i am nuclear war (thanks mr turnip!) but, like also my wife teaches elementary so i follow those godsdamned statistics.
Bro put the bong down you’re not supposed to drink the water
That’s exactly what i’d expect a sippy cup full of delicious bong water to say
Israel does that too, curious 😑
That’s part of the strategy.
Often, the innocent civilians, particularly the children targeted, are children or immediate family of high ranking military personnel.
They want the people making important decisions to be in a compromised state of mind.
Not only is it not an accident, it’s the fucking strategy.
So disgusting, I can’t even call them people anymore
sigh
:(
Voting Trump in once was a horrendous mistake. Voting Trump in twice is unforgivable.
This was happening under Obama, Bush, and all those other “non Trumps”
They didnt suck this bad at it tho.
Yeah the war crimes have been constant, but generally narrow in focus. disrupting the flow of oil and fertilizer to the world is next level.
deleted by creator
It’s not just a Trump thing. Bush destroyed Iraq, Obama destroyed Libya, Biden destroyed Palestine, Carter destroyed Cambodia, Truman destroyed Korea, etc. Statesian imperialism and genocide is bipartisan.
my dude, statesian imperialism has always been happening. this is coming from a californian who has not liked it and has been voting, demonstrating, and doing what i can politically to influence stuff the other direction. our votes change internal politics a fair amount. international politics, Democrat or Republican it don’t matter one fuck the US is the US, it’s mostly run by the career politicians.
This is where Trump coming in fucks things up in a completely different way than previous presidents and differently than his first term, because he’s gutted the career politicians out of the agencies that make up the US government, for example the folk at the state department who’ve been there since Carter, ones who had no political loyalty just loyalty to US imperialism, and replaced them with folks who only have loyalty to Trump. I’ve been struggling to find the words to describe the enormity and speed of the corruption that’s happened in the last year and a half. To call it mindboggling does it a disservice. Mindboggling only puts you about a quarter, maybe a sixth of the way down the path of befuddlement down to where krasnov is.
My point isn’t that Trump is the exact same. My point is that, ultimately, he serves the same role, only at a different point in the decline of the US Empire. Time is not static, with each day and second that passes, the world changes, and these changes reinforce further changes. Quantity turns into quality.
If you look below, @lookitsjustin@lemmy.ca and I came to a relative understanding. I’m not trying to say there’s nothing unique about Trump, my point is to draw connections to what is actually similar. This mirrors how Marx radically transformed how we understand capitalism, by looking at how it was similar to feudalism and connected to it, not just by looking at the differences.
As for the Krasnov jab, ultimately the narrative that Trump is a Russian puppet is rather baseless. The war in Ukraine would already be over, and Russia would no longer be sanctioned. It seems this narrative is trying to make Russia a scapegoat for Statesian imperialism, and make it seem like it isn’t a core aspect of the way the US works.
yeah, sometimes i want to pretend we’re in 1932 instead of 1938
What’s largely different is that the US is a moribund empire, with a rising socialist alternative that it definitely cannot attack. We are in 2026, and that’s a fantastic time to get organized. Socialism is rising in popularity across the west among working people, and we will be able to establish socialism. It’s necessary, sensible, and possible.
That’s whataboutism. Right now, the focus is on Trump.
Sure, and then it will become whoever replaces him that’s the new problem. My point isn’t to dismiss Trump’s complicity in genocide and imperialism, but to instead highlight the actual problem: imperialism as a stage in capitalist development in general, and the US Empire’s present status as the moribund global hegemon in particular. Trump is a symptom of the problem, not the primary problem.
Regarding “whataboutism,” comparistics is a valid form of analysis. My point isn’t to erase Trump, but to put him in his proper context. Pinning the blame squarely on Trump as though he is individually responsible obfuscates what’s actually going on, and leads us to the idea that if we just vote him out, our problems will be gone. They won’t. This is why we need proper analysis of the problem. We cannot end imperialism without ending capitalism, and replacing it with socialism.
This cannot be done at the ballot box either, it must be comprehensive, otherwise it will get reverted just like the social democratic period under FDR (which primarily benefited white workers in the US while leaving black and brown workers to remain as underpaid labor, as well as the expansion of imperialism).
Pump the brakes. I’m not revising American history as you seem to suggest with “pinning everything on Trump.” Good lord, obviously previous US presidents are to blame for their various actions in many different countries.
We’re gonna have to try and find a happy medium here. Because we can’t simply say “all presidents have done this and it’s as simple as America having an imperialist attitude” because we need to hold every single one of these people accountable.
I’m a non-American observer. You’ll notice that Obama’s reputation is intact globally and most consider him to be an excellent president in hindsight despite many transgressions like his popularization of drone strikes.
Bush should be held accountable. Obama should be held accountable. Trump should be held accountable.
I think we’re arguing two sides of the same coin here. I agree we can’t ignore the past but we also can’t ignore the present. And Trump has taken his predecessors’ ideas of imperialism to a whole new level - no denying that.
I’m a Canadian. Threatening to annex Canada? You better believe our attitudes here are going to be far more hostile to Trump than they ever were towards Obama. That’s just the way it is.
We’re in agreement - the United States of America (irrespective of who heads the executive branch) is at odds with most of the world. You guys are stuck in a centuries-old attitude of conquest and I can only hope for the world’s sake that you can eventually break free of this perspective.
I’m not trying to be mean here, just take your point to a higher level, one that gets at the heart of the issue. I disagree that the US Empire is being imperialist because of “an imperialist attitude.” Imperialism is not merely a whim, it’s a material process that evolves from earlier stages of capitalism. As capital consolidates, forming monopoly finance capital, it seeks to endlessly expand beyond its borders. This search for new profits leads to the establishment of military monopoly, IP monopoly, dollar monopoly, and cultural monopoly. This is the origin of institutions like the IMF, NATO, and more, and are how the US actually gains the wealth it has at it’s highest levels.
What’s important here is it means that an individual president cannot stop it. It also means that the west in general is reliant on these very same institutions, and thus benefits from it. Canada is an interesting point to bring up. Canada, like the US, is both an imperialist state, and a settler-colony. Canada too is reliant on imperialism and the very same institutions the US is. The US, however, is hegemonic, while also rapidly losing its unipolar position thanks to the rise of China and the global south in general. This leads it into conflict with its former allies, secondary imperialist powers, much the same as how Germany began colonizing Europe the same way Europe colonized the rest of the world.
What remains necessary is as I said, ending capitalism to end imperialism, and we can only do so through the establishment of socialism.
Ending capitalism would be lovely. But let me know how we’re supposed to achieve that in the context of US imperialism, tech companies and billionaires hoarding wealth, and the average person gradually losing their voices.
It seems to me that nearly every system in place is there specifically to perpetuate capitalism.
Trump viscerally hates the average American so it seems very clear this movement can’t and won’t begin in the US. He doesn’t want his voters to prosper. And, further to that, Trump has an army of sycophants foaming at the mouth to take over if he dies or god-willing just goes away.
We’re clearly on the same side here in most respects.
Well, the first step is understanding that we need socialism and to end capitalism. We are already there, you and I! The next is understanding how revolutions actually work. Throughout all revolutionary history, one central through line is common: it is the great masses of society that actually make revolution. This means that class consciousness must grip the masses, and that these masses must be organized.
This is where we can and must be proactive. We can and must start with our own education, our own study of our existing conditions. We must also build up a disciplined group of workers that, through constant political work amongst the rest of the workers, gain their support and respect. When crisis hits, and it inevitably does on a regular basis in capitalism, we take the momentum of the working classes and use our own experience and study to help steer it in a positive direction.
This general process has unfolded in Russia, China, Cuba, and many other places. It’s a proven strategy, one that we can rely on. We need to adapt to new surveillance, and the crackdown on speech, but revolutionaries have been in worse positions before. Over time, organizing has won more rights that cannot be as easily taken away. The intense concentration of wealth in the hands of fewer and fewer people only serves to bolster our ranks and further outnumber them.
In essense, it’s the age-old adage:
EDUCATE!
AGITATE!
ORGANIZE!
Reducing US imperialism to trump is such a lib move.
I really can’t take anybody who says “lib” unironically seriously.
The stupidity of libs can never be understated, your stupid comment just made it more obvious. You lot rather side with your imperialist troops than face this reality that your nation was built by terrorizing the world.
What the fuck are you talking about? Genuinely. And which nation do you assume I represent, exactly?
The chances are that you represent the invaders of Iraq and Afghanistan, i.e. NATO.
As is tradition
The US loves to blow up weddings murdering civilians and of course most importantly killing children.
“President of peace” everybody. Just making sure the ENTIRE world hates the US.
As if any other U.S. president in modern history was any better 🤣
To be fair, the US became the world’s imperial hegemon after World War II. What changed is the advancement of social media, making it far harder to hide the crimes of empire. Vietnam was the first real exposure to televised war in the west, and the media was key to the anti-war movement. The US then exerted tighter control on the media apparatus, but this is much harder to do with social media.
China and Russia figured out how to do it with social media. Most of their people don’t even know of their empire’s crimes.
That’s not really true, though. The US has a far more sophisticated media apparatus, that has existed for longer. China’s censorship is open and well-understood by the population, the US’s is secret while pretending it doesn’t exist. Further, neither China nor Russia are “empires,” not for centuries in China’s case and about a century in Russia’s case.
That’s not really true, though. China and Russia have a far more sophisticated media censorship apparatus, and their polling indicates they have no idea the level of propaganda they are being faced with every day. Half of Americans hate their own country, and are free to post about it on the internet, and consume media that aligns with their view, without fear of being arrested like Ding Jiaxi.
And tell that to the refugees of China’s raping of its neighbours fish zones, or Russia’s brutal invasion of Ukraine.
From the other day:
https://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2026/08/29/autistici-inventati-trump-terrorists-news/
“A single signature by Trump can remove you from the internet”
“No you” is not a compelling argument. Why is it that you believe Russia and China to have a more sophisticated propaganda apparatus, despite the US’s propaganda apparatus existing for centuries longer, with far more money behind it? Further, the idea that speech is free in the US is horribly wrong. Left-wing media and organizing like the subpoena of BreakThrough News and the attacks by Marco Rubio on the DSA, PSL, and even individuals like Hasan Piker prove that what matters is that only capitalist speech is allowed, while workers are crushed.
Chinese censorship targets those that undermine their socialist system. This is openly understood, and thus subversive organizing is also targeted, just like in the US. The major difference is that the CPC is a worker-party, and is thoroughly subject to the will of the entire working class. This is why Chinese citizens have much greater approval for their own democracy than the US does:
And to drive the point home, the bottom 50% of China has been consistently prioritized, while elsewhere the poor are discarded and left behind:
Meaningless sloganeering is not an actual way to understand the world. If we flail about in vulgar “whataboutisms” rather than genuine comparistics, then we will fail to actually see what’s going on. We must, as the Chinese Marxists say, seek truth from facts. We must not presuppose a conclusion and justify it based on ideology.
Why is it you are aware “no you” isn’t a compelling argument, and then proceed to make a “no you” argument?
You make bold declarations like “the US’s propaganda apparatus existing for centuries longer, with far more money behind it”, with absolutely no evidence or sources to back up these claims.
China does not target people who undermine socialism. It targets people who undermine capitalism. People like Ding Jiaxi, who called on Xi Jinping and other top-level government officials to lead the way in dislosing their financial assets.
Trump supporters in Red leaning states also have extremely high approval ratings for their leader, this is evidence of the efficacy of propaganda, not democracy.
An unsourced image comparing China to America proves nothing to anyone, other than the fact that you are locked in a propaganda campaign to manufacture consent for a new cold war.
I agree that meaningless sloganeering is not an actual way to understand the world. So why do you do it? Do you accuse me of “whataboutisms” while engaging in them yourself in a Trump-style tactic to dismiss any such accusation as more “no you” arguments?
The Chinese are not Marxists, and they do not seek the truth, they bury it.
It’s good that you read about the subpoena of BreakThrough News and the attacks by Marco Rubio on the DSA, PSL, and even individuals like Hasan Piker.
Read up on Ding Jiaxi too.
I did not make a “no you” argument, I explicitly addressed your argument and changed it to one of comparistics. I referenced hard data and gave a materialist response, drawing on the immense improval of living conditions in China.
The fact that the US’s propaganda apparatus has existed for centuries longer can be understood by the simple fact that the modern Chinese and Russian states are less than a century old. Both saw immense changes in societal makeup and organization between the old states and the new. The US emerged as the world’s imperial hegemon in the aftermath of World War II, as I already explained earlier, while China was just forming its new society and attempting to overcome the problems of feudalism. The USSR, meanwhile, dissolved in 1991, resulting in the modern Russian Federation and intense economic devastation, devastation that resulted in the single greatest drop in life expectancy in history outside of wartime.
As for Ding Jiaxi, he was organizing directly against the socialist state of China, in a subversive manner. This is openly understood to be illegal in China, as it is in every state. China is a socialist country, not capitalist, so the process of developing socialism comes through reform, not subversion. China has been governed by Marxist-Leninists since 1949, and this has only strengthened under Xi Jinping. More schools for Marxism have been opened in China, and the CPC has over 100 million members.
You do not have an argument, you merely copy and paste what I said while changing keywords. This is ineffective propaganda on your part at best.
You’re talking to a .ml user.
The internet is not a neutral space. A country having its own social media platforms instead of letting American companies harvest their citizens’ data is not truly censorship.
their polling indicates they have no idea the level of propaganda they are being faced with every day.
You’re being solipsistic. Not everything you disagree with based on personal whims is “propaganda.”
Lots of countries have their own social media platforms. Only China will jail you for posting questions like “how much do our leaders make?”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ding_Jiaxi
Only Russia will jail you for posting “I disagree with the war.”
Only Iran will jail you for posting “I think women should have more rights.”
You’re being solipsistic.
Nobody talks like this. Nobody in the real world says this. I know you’re capable of talking without using 5 dollar words to obscure logic and escape from an argument in a cloud of poor reasoning.
Not everything you disagree with based on personal whims is “propaganda.”
That’s right. But we’re not talking about whether or not Captain Picard is the best Star Trek captain. We’re not discussing disagreements on personal whims. We’re talking about whether or not an unelected state apparatus with the power in the hands of a handful of rich elites should have total control over everything you’re allowed to see and say. That’s propaganda. That’s what’s going on in Russia, and Iran, and China. And probably America soon, the way they’re headed with Trump.
I’m afraid you’re being maliciously obtuse. There is no need to criticize my pretty regular vocabulary. And the fact that you think the USA hasn’t historically been at the center of the imperialist propaganda machine fruther confirms the need to end our conversation.
Even Iran figured out how to just shut off the internet when everyone was demanding too much freedom for women. It’s not hard to do with social media, it’s hard to do with a populace that is accustomed to freedom.
Iran shutting off the internet ultimately helped prevent Israeli penetration. Mossad had active elements stirring up unrest and terrorism in Iran.
But the protests for women’s liberation were real, and the Iranian regime shut off the internet during those protests in order to suppress them. Even if Mossad was involved in stirring up that unrest it does not justify the state crackdown, nor can it be denied that there is grassroots support for women’s liberation in Iran. If you want your country to be less susceptible to manipulation by foreign agents your best bet is to give the people what they want so that they aren’t negatively polarized against their government in the first place. Every injustice enforced is an exploitable weakness that your adversaries can seize upon.
I agree that women’s rights not only can, but should be improved in Iran. The important nuance here, though, is that social progress is severely stunted when a society is under active siege and infiltration. All states inevitably become more repressive than they otherwise would be when their legitimate security concerns are relentlessly violated. The quest of the Iranian people for social progress is interconnected with the quest of the Iranian people for sovereignty.
Mossad infiltrating the protests, that started with legitimate grievances, exacerbated the violence in an attempt to weaken the Iranian state, preceding the war. It was deliberate, and not for the benefit of women in any capacity. Iranians now are more socially cohesive than before the protests ramped up precisely due to the resistance against imperialist aggression.
I agree with all of that except for the inevitability of repression in a society under siege. Yes, that is a historical trend, but it’s also a choice that leadership makes, and it’s the wrong one. If the Iranian government made concessions on women’s rights, queer rights, etc. while holding firm on national sovereignty it would reduce the level of negative polarization the Iranian people have towards their government giving Mossad less to work with to destabilize Iran.
I can agree with it being the morally wrong decision by leadership while also understanding that the progression of history is driven primarily by material conditions, rather than the actions of individuals. The social struggle in Iran is one that is driven by the consciousness of the masses in Iran, and their struggle at this moment is principally against Israeli and Statesian aggression. Unfortunately, the fight for women’s rights in Iran cannot be genuinely struggled against when Israel and the US take every chance they can to leverage that into being able to commit genocide against the Iranian people.
Would it be excellent if women’s rights were improved from the top-down in Iran? Yes. Is it likely to happen? No. This is why taking a materialist analysis of the Iranian war and events leading up to it is so critical for understanding our historic moment.
Regardless, the Iranian people presently near-fully support the IRGC and the Iranian government. Even if some do have a desire to socially reform Iran, achieving better rights, right now it’s secondary by far to surviving the war and maintaining sovereignty. That’s why these struggles are interconnected so closely.
You should watch Johnny Harris’ video about the Western puppet regimes installed in Iran.
Maybe worry a little more about US laws restricting freedom for women lately.
I’ve actually already seen this video, and it doesn’t change my stance. Iranian leadership has a choice in how they respond to foreign manipulation and they do not have to respond with repression of their own populace for fear of their adversaries taking advantage of social unrest when they could instead reduce social unrest by making concessions.
Cowbee, Iran shut off the internet because people were protesting for women’s rights. This was years before the Israeli/American bombing campaign. Stop simping for authoritarian regimes. You sound like an American liberal the way you apologize for their actions.
ran shut off the internet because people were protesting for women’s rights
Iran shut of internet because of organized attempts at insurrection using women’s rights as an excuse. UK/US want another puppet in place shitting on gold toilets selling out the country cheap.
Two things can be true. Personally I think women’s rights are a great reason for insurrection.
They weren’t a reason. They were an excuse.
What you are actually supporting is invading and subjugating Iran.
Also, it is amusing how you (plural) keep speaking about women’s rights when as supposedly a valid reason to invade other countries (a la the white supremacist fairy tale of “civilising savages”) while your empire actually died stuff like the overthrow of the socialist government of Afghanistan that did improve women’s rights.
Mossad openly admitted to being active in Iran:
Go out into the streets together. The time has come. We are with you. Not only from a distance and verbally. We are with you in the field.
If Mossad’s official Twitter account admitted this, how can you say that this wasn’t a critical factor?
You’re dodging the subject. Israel has been fucking with Iran for decades, that’s not the question. The question is why are you okay with Iran shutting down the internet to stop a women’s rights movement?
I’m okay with Iran shutting down the internet to stop a Mossad-backed color revolution intended to pave the way for the modern war against it. Do you think between the protests and the bombing of Minab elementary school that Israel and the US suddenly decided to get involved, or do you realize that this was a part of the actual plan the entire time?
The people of Iran should be able to chart their own course, free from the interference of the genocidal US and Israeli attacks.
And by listing the three major US enemies (currently) in two comments, with reasoning provided by their very media apparatus, you’re the prime example on how the tighter control on media (and social media) actually affects the populace. Thanks for participating.
I’m not American. Russia is no longer a US enemy, listen to what Trump is saying about Putin.
Since when is Trump’s word gospel? Also, who cares, if you’re US-American.
You declared I was “the prime example on how the tighter control on media (and social media) actually affects the populace” solely for the reason that I “list[ed] the three major US enemies”. This is akin to how Trump supporters declare every criticism of Trump as “TDS”, or how Israelis claim every criticism of their country is “anti-semitism”. You can’t shut down a conversation like that here, maybe on .ml, but not here, people are more curious, more prone to individual thought, more prone to asking questions.
Trump’s word isn’t gospel, his actions are too, like how he fought his own party to prevent sanctions being placed on Russia, or how they are the only country he hasn’t placed tariffs on.
You declared (…) solely on the reason (…)
No, I declared you a prime example, because you were immediately using Whataboutism hinged on these three main adversaries (and none other), which only exist as a narrative because the US government declared them as such and you combined these name drops with western propaganda talking points in an attempt, and as the sole reason to comment at all, to discredit a well formulated critique of the US … on a post about the US committing war crimes. It’s like a learned behaviour.
listen to what Trump is saying about Putin.
Trump’s word isn’t gospel, his actions are
It’s getting confusing.
Russia is not “the only country he hasn’t placed tariffs on”, as the US actually has placed tariffs on Russia, as well as heavy sanctions. But you know, the importance of tariffs vanishes, if you can just sanction a country out of the market and into compliance, anyway? There’s also almost no tariffs on the DPRK or Cuba, because they are heavily sanctioned already. Namely secondary sanctions (which are against international law), that disallow other countries to trade with the sanctioned countries.how he fought his own party to prevent sanctions being placed on Russia
Maybe it’s me, but I find this to be theatre. But maybe you can write down your actual thinking on how the overall dynamics work here., you sound like you’re heavily on the Krasnov theory.
The world did already, but just not enough to cut (economic) ties.
Thank goodness for the rise of alternatives like China and the increase in south-south trade, undermining unequal exchange by keeping the wealth within the global south.
Obama did the exact same thing.
There’s never been a POTUS who didn’t.
These types of comments never elaborate or talk about other relevant things like how Obama didn’t take us into a full blown war with Iran
Obama did destroy Libya. Is your point that it was better to turn Libya into a country with open-air slave markets and massacre thousands of people, or is your point that it’s better than the Iran War because it didn’t backfire as splendidly?
And wondered why soldiers drone-bombing civilians from the comfort of air-conditioned offices, thousands of miles away, got PTSD.
Exactly!
Why don’t you use the same internet you’re using to look it up? You’ll remember longer.
Obama has been maligned for it too. Trump deserves the same ridicule.
Just making sure the ENTIRE world hates the US.
Bush Jr took you to the brink of that (after marching towards that cliff hard with other previous admins)… the US only needed a nudge to get there and electing a child rapist was like taking the off ramp into the void
There’s a big difference from “we’re going to rename French fries” to “we’re going to invade Greenland”.
Bush did a ton of evil shit… let’s not pretend he was just a silly goose
What in the enhanced interrogations could you be talking about? The man just wants to paint puppies, why are you being so mean to him?
What evil shit did he do for the world (specifically US allies) to hate the US?
Before you answer, let me remind you that most people don’t care about anything that happens to anyone more than 100 km from them.
Bombing Iraq and Afghanistan? Those are far away and there’s always a war in the middle east.
Torturing people? Par for the course in America.
What evil shit did he do for the world (specifically US allies)
So, you think that the world begins and ends with the invaders of Iraq and Afghanistan?
I’d love to be proven wrong, but bombing weddings and torturing people doesn’t make people abandon the US. Tariffs on the other hand…
So you want me to list evil stuff but exclude wars that killed hundreds of thousand civilians because you don’t care about those people and torturing humans because the USA does that too often to count?
I think when you say “most people don’t care” you are still just referring to the USA population
The question was about “the world abandoning the US”. What I think is irrelevant, look at the opinion polls in 2005 and 2025.
So invading Afghanistan and Iraq was justifiable enough for you?
The comment thread you are replying to was about actions that made America hate its enemies. Not anyone’s personal opinion on the justifiability of these actions. I think you are confusing their suggestion that the verbal attacks against France/Greenland made the entire world hate the US more than the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan for a comment on whether these invasions were justified, perhaps in a knee-jerk, strawman-like fashion.
The comment above that I replied to had the effect, regardless of intentions, of dismissing and whitewashing the actions of past US administrations, in a way that reduces the illegal invasions of the current administration into an exceptional, idiosyncratic, and one-off behavior. The reality is the US has been hated worldwide for far too long, at least since the end of WW2. I hope I was informative and pertinent enough according to your standards.
The comment above that I replied to had the effect, regardless of intentions, of dismissing and whitewashing the actions
No, it didn’t, that’s the “knee-jerk” thing I was talking about earlier. See also: Israelis and “anti-semitism”.
Doesn’t matter “to me”, I was about public opinion, and it barely moved the needle, because at the end of the day, it didn’t affect the average Joe.
Didn’t even need to, I walked there fine.
It’s the same high-control, unhealthy policies though, that includes all the hate on LGBTQ+ people too. That was big in his terms, anti-gay ballot initiatives based on lies that hurt people, that turned out the prejudiced base to elect him and others that caused damage here and abroad. It’s always regress and ruin progress, and, yes, the latest maga version of the party is even worse.
This is murder man
Been going on by USA for >20 years.
stares blankly
You’re kidding right!? More like 250 years.
More like >400.
How old do you think the USA is?
Settler-colonialism began in Turtle Island well before the USA was founded. The colonies did not appear out of thin-air on 1776.
Is the USA that OLDDDD?
If anything, they disappeared into thin air in 1776
US and bombing weddings in the middle east, name a more classic combo.
Israel and sniping children?
Billionaires and raping kids?
Conservatives and molesting underage girls?
idk, I could keep naming duos…
Making more terrorists. A time-honored American tradition
Sounds like Israel tactics as they continue the Palestinian genocide.
I’m all for shitting on Israel, and I’m sure they’ve bombed weddings before, but if anything this is a US classic.
who do you think pulls the pedo-blackmail strings of the diaper filler in chief
The Statesian capitalist class. The idea that Israel controls the US is an attempt to scapegoat Israel now that public opinion on the Zionist entity has reversed. Israel may be a genocidal settler-colony, but it is only so because the US supports it for their own imperialist interests in the region.
“Statesian”? “Zionist entity”? You talk like Jordan Peterson.
You know there are much simpler, more descriptive words for these, yet you choose these 5 dollar words to sound more academic and thus more respectable. Academia is not about obfuscating ideas and obscuring reasoning.
If you think everyday words are $5, get a weekly vocabulary lesson for free, online. It’s not up to us to dumb ourselves down all the time, drag yourself UP, and get the needed hand.
I didn’t realize Jordan Peterson was an anti imperialist. I’m not an academic, I chose my words deliberately to convey my feelings about the subjects.
Jordan Peterson is a grifter who uses big, confusing words around polarizing subjects. Like this:
https://www.wisdomofpeterson.com/
So you use words like “Statesian” out loud when you’re talking in-person?
Do you think “Statesian” is a big, confusing word? I don’t acknowledge “America” or “Israel” as legitimate states.
No this is more like Russian tactics as they continue the Ukrainian genocide.
OK. They model themselves on Nazi Germany, who modeled themselves on slaver USians.
The world is ravaged,
By a handful of tyrants,
The faithful voted
That’s an Israeli trick. I wonder if that’s where we learned it?
Call it a congineering project.
No don’t worry the US had already been using those since manifest destiny.
Hey, they are copying the plot from Homeland.
