• Photonic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    an action in progress

    Indeed present progressive.

    As in the sanctions that we have applied in the present are working to progressively drain the economy.

    If the three sanctions packages were already draining the economy why oh why did she need 17 more? She didn’t say will be draining after we implement 17 more. If you say “are draining” you’re talking about what you have already done to set a process in motion and not what you’re planning to do. How hard is it? You really keep swinging and missing.

    And if you had actually read this article from 2024, which we talked about extensively, you would have known that the Russian economy was in fact not being drained at all.

    It also has nothing to do with the fact that I don’t understand how sanctions work. Everyone knows that loopholes have to be closed. I don’t need a mansplainy “explanation” of something that is completely obvious.

    European sanctions have reduced Russian fossil fuel export revenues by about $300-500 million per day

    For the umpteenth time, that was not the three sanctions packages. Learn the meaning of the word “are”.

    Strawman. “draining the economy” is not about making things a little more shitty for ordinary Russians.

    Maybe quote the entire sentence if you’re gonna cry strawman. Now you’ve created one of your own.

    It’s about reducing Russia’s ability to finance the war

    Just let the war keep festering then for longer? You still can’t answer the question because you know you’re wrong.

    People like you were told in at the very start in 2022 that the real world doesn’t work like TikTok instant gratification, and here you are more than 4 years later still not having gotten the point.

    Dumbass still doesn’t understand what “I’ll believe it when I see it” means… Maybe look up a phrase before you start commenting if you don’t understand it? What I’m saying is the opposite of instant gratification, you dunce. And I’ve never been on TikTok.

    • Vergissmeinnicht@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      If the three sanctions packages were already draining the economy why oh why did she need 17 more? She didn’t say will be draining after we implement 17 more. If

      1 hole in a bucket drains the bucket 3 drain it faster, so why do you need 17 more? because holes can be plugged and 20 drain it faster than 3. Are you really this fucking stupid?

      • Photonic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        Are you really this fucking stupid?

        Questions are forbidden, as I’ve heard. But to answer your question, I’m very positive I’m far more intelligent than you.

        So how do you explain this: https://www.russiamatters.org/node/35164 ?

        And you don’t need to ask me whether I’m stupid if you really think the first three packages were sufficient to drain the Russian economy, you naive fool.

        • Vergissmeinnicht@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          So how do you explain this: https://www.russiamatters.org/node/35164 ?

          Then where did their $300 billion war chest drain to dumbass? Already addressed in previous comments. But you’re too illiterate to read.

          if you really think the first three packages were sufficient to drain the Russian economy,

          You just don’t fucking know what “drain” means.

          You assume drain must mean drain completely to 0 so Russia completely starves.

          The first package was already draining, the next were draining more. Already explained to you by others at the very beginning of the thread, and by me multiple times. That’s how sanctions work.

          I’m very positive I’m far more intelligent than you.

          You certainly think so, yes, that is very obvious. That is your biggest problem really.

          • Photonic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Okay, I didn’t want to ask anymore questions because I’m trying to to be nice.

            But…

            Do you know what an economy is?

            And

            Do you know what GDP is?

            And

            Do you know that if the percentage of GDP is above 0% it generally means that an economy is growing?

            And

            Do you know that draining and growing are opposites?

            You certainly think so, yes, that is very obvious. That is your biggest problem really.

            Some things you don’t think, some you just know.

            • Vergissmeinnicht@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              Do you know that if the percentage of GDP is above 0% it generally means that an economy is growing?

              Ok buddy, you have got the spirit, but you really need to tackle topics in your wheelhouse.

              The percentage of GDP being above 0% is meaningless. >0% of what?

              If the GDP growth rate is >0 then the economy is growing. That would be the amount of additional GDP in relation to existing GDP over a given timeframe or (ΔGDP/GDP)/Δt, usually over one year (Δt = 1 annum) or annualized for ease of comparison. Usually expressed as (ΔGDP/GDP)*100% where the Δt is implied.

              here is a more in depth explatation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_growth

              Once you’ve digested that, look at Stimulus and Quantitative Easing

              That will explain where the $300 billion of the NWF that weren’t frozen disappeared to. And why the Russian banks now experience such a dire liquidity crisis.

              And once you understand all of that you can put 2 and 2 together, and understand WHY the Russian economy had such low growth rates despite such a gargantuan stimulus effort.

              There is a massive hole in the economy, through which an enormous amount of money has been draining, which is the aforementioned sanctions. And Russia had to pump almost the entirety of their remaining NWF into the economy and also do an enormous amount of QE to keep the economy at a slightly elevated growth rate. Although since late last year that’s no longer working and the economy has been in a recession.

              And we’ve come full circle. (Or rather we will have come full circle once you’ve done your required reading to understand the subject matter)

              • Photonic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                24 minutes ago

                LOL a lot of words to tell me that I am right.

                Nice copy pasting from ChatGPT too.

                You still can’t admit it huh? Stupidity and pride are a hell of a combination.

                Early in the war, the broad consensus was that the new sanctions would devastate the Russian economy. By some metrics, though, Russia’s economy has proved resilient to date.

                From the US government

                Following Russia’s full-fledged invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Western countries imposed unprecedented economic sanctions.Yet there is limited evidence that these measures have inflicted substantial economic pain on Russia, as the recent slowdown has largely reflected factors unrelated to sanctions.

                From the ESCP geopolitics institute

                And you still claim I don’t understand the topic…

                low growth

                So it was growth. Thank you. You could have been a lot shorter with that.

                And we’ve come full circle. (Or rather we will have come full circle once you’ve done your required reading to understand the subject matter)

                Full circle indeed. We’ve once again arrived at the point where it is completely obvious to anyone that I’m completely right, but you’re too obtuse to admit it. This entire discussion could have been avoided if you would just have reacted like a normal person who gets shown they’re wrong about something.

                If I you claim don’t understand it, and I’m schooling you, where does that leave you?