• Beacon@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    And also cheaper because steam expects to make additional money on each user in the future via steam purchases, so they can keep the margin smaller in the hardware price

    • wcSyndrome@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 day ago

      Steam has explicitly said they are not subsidizing the steam machine as other console makers do

      • Beacon@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        iirc they said they weren’t selling at a loss, but that’s not the same thing as selling at a low margin. PC manufacturers have to make essentially 100% of their profit from the initial sale of the device, but valve can make a smaller profit from the sale of each device because they know each device will lead to additional profit through game purchases

        • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I thought pc makers made side profits with all the bloatware they install. And possibly some weird deals with M$ too.

        • FierroG@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          They don’t know that, if they sell cheap enough it might be worth it for a random office somewhere to order a hundred and use them as work computers with no intention to ever buy a game in them. Also they aren’t going to be locked, nothing prevents you from getting one and run games purchased in every market under the sun that isn’t steam (and/or pirated games).

          I don’t think they have any certainty that they’ll even make decent money on them. I am hopeful that this will be good for everyone but can’t exactly see how at the moment.