

So then don’t carry 500 in cash then. You only need enough cash in your wallet to cover the expenses you might encounter in a single day. And having cash on you doesn’t mean you can’t have cards too in case you need more money
So then don’t carry 500 in cash then. You only need enough cash in your wallet to cover the expenses you might encounter in a single day. And having cash on you doesn’t mean you can’t have cards too in case you need more money
The fuck are you talking about? If anything i took the word no MORE directly than op was intending
Huh, i suppose that’s probably what they meant, but even with that interpretation already in my mind it’s really hard for me to see how that’s actually conveyed through what they wrote. Thanks for the info
Why would she say no she doesn’t hear it all the time, and then say it’s in the top 5 things she hears? I’m sure i must be misreading this somehow
No, that may be what you WANT it to mean, but this is a very clear two-word phrase that can only mean one thing by any english speaker. Words mean things, you can’t just use alternative definitions any more than Republicans can use alternative facts. Words are words, and facts are facts.
No, the problem is the saying itself. It literally just says “believe women”. There’s no room for interpretation in there. The problem is the phrase itself. If you want a phrase that means take women’s allegations seriously, then the phrase you should use is “take women’s allegations seriously”
OMG stop. I voted for Harris. I VOLUNTEERED for Harris. After looking into the claims against Trump i believe the women’s accusations are absolutely true. And i also know that no one’s claims should just be believed automatically without doing further looking into the facts first
No one should be “just believed”. Everyone’s claims should be taken seriously and looked into. But no one should be believed automatically.
Yeah, something like that. Maybe cash should be the chair of the council