weird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 4 months agoThe duality of mansub.wetshaving.socialimagemessage-square6linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageThe duality of mansub.wetshaving.socialweird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 4 months agomessage-square6linkfedilink
minus-squarejjjalljs@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 months agoHuh. I guess no one says “monosexual”
minus-squarespankinspinach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months ago“No mono” doesn’t have the same ring to it. Unless you’re indicating that you don’t have mono, in which case, it’s… informative?
minus-squaremoody@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 months agoYou don’t need the mono- if there’s only one. It’s just sexual.
minus-squarejjjalljs@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 months agoSometimes you do. Like monologue. Monogamy. Hm but I guess the root isn’t a whole word in those cases.
Huh. I guess no one says “monosexual”
“No mono” doesn’t have the same ring to it. Unless you’re indicating that you don’t have mono, in which case, it’s… informative?
You don’t need the mono- if there’s only one. It’s just sexual.
Sometimes you do. Like monologue. Monogamy. Hm but I guess the root isn’t a whole word in those cases.