I disagree that only one is of interest to the public.
He’s CEO of a publicly traded company. It’s relevant to anyone with even a fraction of a share, which could be a large percentage of the population given the diversification of mutual funds, retirement accounts, etc.
Infidelity is an indicator of his decision making capability. Whether he can properly estimate the results and consequences of his decisions and actions.
I mean, the infidelity with a possible spy is also an issue.
Those are two different things and only of them is (should be) of interest to the public.
I disagree that only one is of interest to the public.
He’s CEO of a publicly traded company. It’s relevant to anyone with even a fraction of a share, which could be a large percentage of the population given the diversification of mutual funds, retirement accounts, etc.
Infidelity is an indicator of his decision making capability. Whether he can properly estimate the results and consequences of his decisions and actions.
I have to admit, the shareholder’s mind is a mystery to me.