cross-posted from: https://scribe.disroot.org/post/11858823
…
Over the weekend, Ukraine carried out a co-ordinated drone strike against several major Russian data centres. This completely decimated Russia’s Yandex, … which controls more than 70% of search traffic in the country, and has reportedly resulted in a dramatic fall in bot traffic from the Yandex network.
As per the bot analysts at Tom’s Hardware, bot traffic from the Yandex network has dropped to just 0.4% of the maximum number of HTTP requests recorded in the past two weeks. That means activity from automated, Russian-hosted accounts has been virtually eliminated on social media.
…
As a result, the social media engagement on posts from [far-right] Reform UK figures appears to have dropped in the wake of Ukrainian strikes on Russian data centres.
…
There has already been a strong and significant impact on bot traffic in countries such as France and Germany.
David Colon, a French information operations researcher, has noted a huge difference in the performance of narratives generated by the Russia-linked information operations group, Storm-1516.
The silencing of the bots also appears to have caused a dramatic drop in activity around Germany’s far-right AfD…
…
Amongst others, the article is citing Britain’s Reform politician Richard Tice. Three posts on X from the Reform deputy leader to his almost 400,000 followers on Monday, 11 October [hadn’t] hit triple figures for reposts or comments, with one not even reaching 10,000 views … Before the Ukrainian strikes on the Russia data centres, Tice’s posts got considerably more engagement, consistently hitting triple figures for comments and reposts, whilst racking up hundreds of thousands of views.
…
A similar pattern can be seen when it comes to other far-right figures such as Nigel Farage [the linked article is given evidence about that].
…
As Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky himself said after the strikes on Russian data centres, it’s suddenly become a “little easier to breathe” on social media.
…
What’s this, using an evil imperialist NATO source as support?
BBC would have an evil imperialist NATO incentive to say that the Russian bots DID slow down after the bombing. So them saying that it didn’t happen makes this more believable.
It’s almost like saying one thing is unbelievable just because of its source is just as bad as saying something is completely believable just because of its source.
I know. MLs frequently don’t.
LOL
Tell me about it. You’ve gotta be able to recognize bias in reporting, which helps in understanding where why and when a mainstream source would lie.
I wouldn’t trust the BBC if they say Israel is not doing a genocide, because it’s in their best interest for the population to remain friendly with colonizers in the middle east. I do trust them when they say that a strike on their enemy didn’t negatively affect bot traffic, because they would fucking love to blow up a Russian data center and kill Russian bot networks.
So someone is forcing them to publish this article? They’re gnashing their teeth?
Is that really what you understood from my message? Really?
No, I’m wondering why they’d publish an article so very against their own alleged interests when, allegedly, they usually bend the truth wherever they can and are so very untrustworthy and they could just, idk, say nothing.
Gotta report the truth sometimes 🤷
And throw our Holy Cow Zelenskyy under the bus like that? Kind of counterproductive, if you ask me.
You think the people in charge are intelligent?
Of course (not). The enemy is always stupid and cunning at the same time.