• ohulancutash@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    You’re thinking of Dambusters.

    And it was still derogatory, but not as weaponised as the US. More like how they used the lesser N word.

      • Zwiebel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah this always irks me about english/the anglosphere, people act like mentioning a word is the same as directing it at someone as an insult

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s hammered into a lot of people’s heads that the word is very mean, and not just “insult” but “remember, people like you used to be considered animals and treated like property, subject to difficult to fathom attrocities”.
          It doesn’t need to be directed to be a reminder. While reference is likewise a reminder, it’s at least couched in terms that convey the speaker understands it has weight beyond “insult”.
          Couple that with saying it as a white person can carry significant reputation damage.

          Since these lessons are usually imparted in childhood implicitly, and it doesn’t come up often enough to drive introspection for most people, it just lingers as “don’t say words that hurt people and make everyone dislike you”.

    • yucandu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      They still use “bugger” in the UK, which is basically the same thing but for gay people.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        For years I thought “bugger” just means “to annoy” or something like that, so I would say things like “This buggers me” or “You don’t have to get so buggered about it.”

        Boy am I embarrassed…

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Once I used it like that at work, everyone was surprised, and so I looked it up after. I’m actually dead now. This is my ghost typing.

        • gmtom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Kind of? Like you could call a child a “little bugger” and that would just be calling them annoying rather than an arse fucker

      • DaGreenGobbo@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ve never encountered that word used with a homophobic intent, as far as I could tell. If you wanted to express that thought in my youth, other words beginning with B would be far more common. Naturally I found them as odious then as I would now.

          • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            So is “gay”. Language evolves. Being a linguistic originalist would be a hard and eccentric hill to die on.

            • yucandu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Being a linguistic originalist would be a hard and eccentric hill to die on.

              Well good I’m glad the UK has abandoned that principle, it was getting a bit pretentious.