• cynar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m hoping that someone does some reverse engineering on the engine management computers of EVs. EVs internals are a lot simpler. An open source, drop in brain is definitely not unachievable.

    All the advantages of an EV with none of the corporate tracking.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Simple to do badly, but still challenging to do elegantly. Managing power/throttle response in every situation is quite complex if you want it to feel good. Kinda like how everyone makes a trackpad, but only Apple makes Apple trackpads.

      And thats before we get into the complications of thermal management with the batteries and heat pumps and stuff.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        More a replacement brain for an EV. Compared to an ICE there is far less to manage in a hyper time critical manner. It’s a lot more viable to design a drop in replacement. Particularly if the battery bank already has its own monitoring, that just reports upwards.

        You would end up with a modern EV, with many of the desired features. However, the manufacturer would no longer be able to reach in and extract data, either remotely, at a mechanic, or after an accident.

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          You can also have that. The ice replacement kits bring everything, and very often use tesla or leaf batteries. If you already have a Tesla battery in your tesla, that much you can save. You lose all the fancy features, remote app management, sentry, etc, but that might be a pro for you…