• Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      It’s interesting to me, I learned an oral history in grad school that’s somewhat different from the wiki record. This isn’t the first time that it’s happened and it’s a lesson that history goes to the documentation.

      I was told that it’s development was tied to looking for suture alternatives and it was abandoned due to inflammation and rough edges on application.

      The lesson, for me, is to be cautious about relying on single sources. I am enough of an expert in my areas (and this is not one of them) to be pretty suspicious of Wikipedia.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        I never knew about the military plane’s application myself. I just knew it was while he was working for Eastman Kodak and it was an accidental discovery.

        I also understand they had to “water it down” because it was too strong.

        Edit: it occurred to me I could be confusing WD-40 with superglue re the accidental discovery comment.

        • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I thought that WD-40 was a purposeful development process. It was the 40th formulation that made it to market.