I believe if everyone who was against the current oligarchy started placing guillotine stickers everywhere, like you might for a favorite band, people would feel less isolated in their distaste for the current system.

And in an ideal world those who the guillotines are for might realize just how much they are in the minority.

  • Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    But as a symbol it current represents the working class revolting against the rich.

    Only to those who are ignorant of its history. And you know what they say about people who are ignorant of history.

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I disagree. You can be knowledgeable about its history while still recognizing its new found symbolic meaning.

      Just like language, symbols change over time. If I say “goodbye”, I am not telling you " God be with you" as per the original meaning.

      Being stubborn about using the original meaning of things isn’t helpful, it’s ignorant of the current meaning.

      Don’t forget the history of the first time the brownshirts were defeated. It wasn’t through peaceful means.

      • Melllvar@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Being stubborn about using the original meaning of things isn’t helpful, it’s ignorant of the current meaning.

        OK. In this context, what does the guillotine symbolize if not the mass execution of political opponents?

        • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          But as a symbol it current represents the working class revolting against the rich. That sentiment isn’t a bad one, it’s desperately needed at this time.

          • Melllvar@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            revolting against the rich

            But a guillotine is not a weapon of war. It’s not even something that the powerless can use against the powerful. Quite the opposite, actually.

            Which makes the guillotine is a terrible symbol for a revolution. Not only is the symbolism ahistorical, but the actual history directly contradicts the supposed symbolism. The modern people who invoke the guillotine as a symbol of revolution are making the exact same mistake that the French Revolutionaries made.

            • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              You can be knowledgeable about its history while still recognizing its new found symbolic meaning.

              Just like language, symbols change over time. If I say “goodbye”, I am not telling you " God be with you" as per the original meaning.

              As a side note, was it a mistake to bomb, kill, and invade nazi Germany?

              If violence was not the answer there, what was the answer?

                • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 hours ago

                  Twice now you’ve ignored my point about how fascists were defeated in the past. And you’ve seemingly understood none of what I’ve said, leading you to ask questions on information I’ve already given.

                  Your concerns are misplaced.

                  • Melllvar@startrek.website
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 hours ago

                    It looks like you ninja-edited in the second part of your comment. I was responding to the original that only had quotes of prior comments and nothing else. That would have been a low-effort comment not really worth responding to.

                    was it a mistake to bomb, kill, and invade nazi Germany?

                    No. But it would be a mistake to start bombing political rallies today, for example.