Yep. When people ignore the point you’re making and just keep saying more words that don’t engage with your critique its generally helpful to return to what your point is.
And you’re still not engaging with my point, and instead just deflecting by joking that I must not be okay because I’m reiterating that its weird and gross to say
she’s purposely putting on a vapid face in order to attract chuds
Still weird. Still not changed by rationalizing it as being purely about her expression. None of:
she’s purposely putting on a vapid face in order to attract chuds
is actually in the photo, or can even be expressed by a single contextless expression-- you made that up. And when I point out that thats weird you are choosing to engage with anything other than the critique I’m making.
Yep. When people ignore the point you’re making and just keep saying more words that don’t engage with your critique its generally helpful to return to what your point is.
And you’re still not engaging with my point, and instead just deflecting by joking that I must not be okay because I’m reiterating that its weird and gross to say
Still weird. Still not changed by rationalizing it as being purely about her expression. None of:
is actually in the photo, or can even be expressed by a single contextless expression-- you made that up. And when I point out that thats weird you are choosing to engage with anything other than the critique I’m making.
But critique remains the same.
For me it’s knowing she’s MAGA that makes it enough for me to know she doesn’t have too much between the ears.
Do you recognize who that is? Cause I don’t, and tbh I don’t think the person I’m replying to did either 😅
If she’s MAGA I think it makes way more sense to critisize her for her actual political ideology, but I have no idea who this image is of
Sydney Sweeney, very famous
tittiesactress.She did a pretty good job in Immaculate (2024), though.