• Waterpumpee@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Where did y’all upload your tutorials? Youtube? Newsflash, big corpo benefitted from it already.

  • Digit@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    <insert the deadpan stare, from every anarcho socialist whatever whoever who had ever critiqued this uneconomic paradigm, that sternly says in its glare “told you so”>

  • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    10 hours ago

    This isn’t “leopards ate not face”, unless you think the people making the guides are responsible for LLM slop

      • radix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I held my nose and went to twitter to check the profile. He’s definitely pro-AI, though I suppose there’s a narrow path of pro-open-source AI but anti-corporate AI.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Might apply to places like Stack Overflow specifically, where the hostility of human interaction made people quite eager to leap to AI instead.

      • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I never ever had to interact on SO and similar sites, I use them solely for searching for solutions, and for that they’re perfect - and probably provide a significant amount of data for answering questions on ChatGPT etc.

        It’s not like the internet didn’t work as an answering machine before AI. Often you can enter the exact same prompt into a search engine instead and get better answers. But oh no, you have to click on a website and maybe even scroll down a little!

        • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Yes it was, I couldn’t post a question that didn’t get downvoted and/or ridiculed for how stupid I was for asking the question in the first place.

          Then I was always told my question isn’t broad enough to even bother asking, so I might as well not ask.

        • Sabata@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          I got told to kill myself and quit programming for asking a beginner question as a kid. Didn’t even get my question answered.

        • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          It has its ups and downs and back when I added a shit ton of responses I always tried to keep being friendly and helpful. But even back then there were dicks on the platform, and not too little of them. At some point, it shifted and the dicks started to overwhelm everything.

    • Carrot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 hours ago

      This is such a bad take. Museums pay for the art they show. If they don’t, it’s because it was donated or on loan. The living artists are compensated, or were happy to give/loan to a museum. The dead artist’s art was bought, donated by the artist’s family, or loaned. In the cases that the art was looted or stolen back during colonial times, most normal humans want those pieces returned to the rightful owners, because it’s theft.

      • _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 minutes ago

        Museums [rob] for the art they [steal]

        Dead people can’t claim copyright, living artists have to sue arms and legs to take their works off museums. Museums are open colonizers’ economic laundering.

    • ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      That’s pretty much how it works? Either someone pays specifically for an artist’s work, or someone might buy it and donate it, or maybe the artist has an exhibition…

      The, post is talking about AI involuntarily taking the collective work of the net and then charging a fee to regurgitate it.

      The difference is choice and free will