The Anti-AI Leader@lemmy.blahaj.zone to memes@lemmy.world · 1 day agoThe AI ‘boom’lemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square4linkfedilinkarrow-up1108arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up1101arrow-down1imageThe AI ‘boom’lemmy.blahaj.zoneThe Anti-AI Leader@lemmy.blahaj.zone to memes@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square4linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarebennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·11 hours agoThat makes it look like AI was striving for functionality. But they are bullshit machines
minus-squareBlaster M@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-27 hours agoDepends on what. LLMs, sure, but AI models, called neural networks before, have been in use in a lot of physics simulations for a long time. At its base, it’s a huge number cruncher. How you crunch the numbers makes rhe difference.
minus-squareThe Anti-AI Leader@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 hours agoThey are bullshit. I agree with you
That makes it look like AI was striving for functionality. But they are bullshit machines
Depends on what. LLMs, sure, but AI models, called neural networks before, have been in use in a lot of physics simulations for a long time. At its base, it’s a huge number cruncher. How you crunch the numbers makes rhe difference.
They are bullshit. I agree with you