• Linke Socke@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Well I concluded that because you didn’t deny that in the previous comment. I tried to make clear why you were called a “human supremacist”. I tried to understand why you think that comparing slaves to animals is only something slave owners do.

      First, this is denying of Science. Humans are in fact also Animals. So I thought, if you think only Slave owners say that, you probably deny that and think your self that animals are much less worth then humans, because you see it a comparison as degrading. This way it would make sense why you think only slave owners would say that. And you didn’t deny it, so went with it in the next comment.

      If you actually do not think that you are more worthy then other animals, then you need to explain your first comment. From what viewpoint are you looking that you thought this comparison is something only slavers are doing. Maybe we just have a misunderstanding.

      • goedel@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        you have a reading comprehension problem. if you just read what i’ve written, you’ll see i’m not saying the same things you are saying i’ve written.

        • Linke Socke@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          ok, ragebait child

          Edit: Ok the “child” was not needed. Sorry, for acctually using that as an insult. I did that because in the other comment you thought its one, where it was acctually still not one. This was not right.

          But:

          Me: Maybe we have a missunderstanding. Lets clear things up

          Him: you have a problem

          How more clear wants a ragebaiter and troll to be, that he is not at all interested in a talk.

          so, I’m still out. Bye