• LittleMouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    It seems to me that companies are deliberately making their AIs stupid to consumers so that they don’t give very sensible advice when necessary, for example.

    • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, it’s money. Running a smart AI uses much more resources, so they’re trying to keep consumer AI as cheap and dumb as they can get away with and put the smarter answers behind a paywall.

      • huppakee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I heard something like OpenAI (or Anthropic?) tweaked one of their AI’s to do well on a certain benchmark test and while they did have the highest score they couldn’t publish the model because it used like $20,000 in electricity alone to make sure it’s answer was correct.

            • davidgro@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              For context, this is a real question that stumped a lot of LLMs:

              “I want to wash my car. The car wash is 100 meters away. Should I walk or drive?”

              Of course it’s famous now, so they have added specific exceptions for it (or just because it’s famous they’ve scraped the solution)

              • [deleted]@piefed.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                It is also a great example of how low people’s expectations are of tech they have spent around a trillion dollars on to get something that is about as good as asking a random person.

                “People get the puzzle wrong!”

                We don’t spend a trillion dollars for someone to fail a simple logic puzzle.