Copy image? Nope, here’s the link instead.

  • fork@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Webp is ass. Kinda weird since its sibling, webm, is goated for supporting transparency.

      • fork@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I mean in terms of video containers, webm is a video container made by the same or adjacent team that made webp. The only other video container I’ve seen that supports transparency is HEVC, which only works in safari.

        Transparency is the only reason I’d ever use webm, just to clarify.

        • Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          If we’re talking in terms of vodeo containers (or codecs), then why are we talking about it on a post about webp?

          Unless you consider webp to be a video container because it does support animated pictures, but, again, it also supports transparency.

          Also, HEVC is not a video (/media) container, it’s a codec.