Germany’s Bundesrat, the upper house of parliament, backed a bill to criminalize the denial of Israel’s right to exist on Friday, a motion that constitutional experts said could jeopardize freedom of expression.

According to the bill, anyone denying Israel’s right to exist or calling for its abolition would be punished with a prison sentence of up to five years under the regulation. The bill will be examined by the Bundestag, the lower house of parliament, after its summer recess.

      • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        No, antisemitism (or really any kind of discriminatory sentiment) is / has been punishable by law already. Among other things, there is precedence that denying Israels right to exist can count as such. While German law is not based on precedence, it shows that it was de facto illegal to do so.

        What is legal is to criticise Israel and call out their crimes against humanity, but the political bubble has somehow been convinced it’s not that bad and they are the good ones.

        • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I don’t see Germany making laws about other state’s rights to exist. And also, states don’t have rights to exist.

          Don’t be a dumb dumb protecting stupid laws.

          • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Don’t be a dumb dumb and read stating a plain fact about law as defense of a new law that seems to be mostly symbolic. Or an expression of my take on states for that matter, because neither has happened here.

            • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Then I apologize on both counts. I understood your matter of fact tone as normalizing the overzealous and biased enforcement of anti-hate laws.

          • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I don’t read this as defending it, just explaining the German government’s view of antisemitism.

            I’ll go further and note that this broad definition adopted by the government led to multiple instances of Jews being arrested for antisemitism for peacefully protesting the apartheid. I’m not defending the law at all, just lamenting that it’s sadly not new, as far as I can tell.

            So I guess I also want to know if anything changed or if they just wanted to pat themselves on the back for formally codifying it.

            • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              That was my bad if they weren’t defending the law (see my comment to their response).

              And yes, I’m aware of the irony that German Jewish people were arrested for their stance against the Palestinian genocide.