• Vergissmeinnicht@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Ok? Cherry picking much?

    That’s not the conclusion they reached, is it? That’s the observation they’re making upon which they base their conclusions. The conclusion they all reached is that it will have major impacts at some undefined point in the future. But that is inconvenient for the point you’re trying to make.

    And Deripaska, still, really? He only cares about his own pockets.

    (Editor’s note: it is now 2026)

    And I guess the editor is so far up his own ass, that he didn’t realize Russia has been in a recession since end of 2025?

    • Photonic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      LOL, these are literally in the titles of the articles. Except for the bonus one, which is the last sentence, in the last paragraph of the one with the headline.

      You won’t stop trying, will you? Hilarious man!

      he didn’t realize Russia has been in a recession since end of 2025?

      Is a recession the same as being out of money?

      And I thought questions were forbidden…

        • Photonic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Hahaha so let me get this straight:

          I said I will believe it when I see it, since I have seen people say things like the headline of this article for years

          You: nah you haven’t.

          I show you a bunch of headlines saying things like the headline of this article.

          And your defense is: “click bait exists” ??

          Hahahahaha just when I thought you couldn’t get any dumber –or more entertaining

          • Vergissmeinnicht@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            I said I will believe it when I see it, since I have seen people say things like the headline of this article for years

            no you didn’t. Don’t lie.

            I’ll believe it when I see it. I have been hearing this since 2022 and they’re unleashing more and more ballistic missiles on Kyiv every week

            Also I never replied to that comment of yours, I commented to your Von der Leyen quote which you implied to be incorrect.

            • Photonic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              no you didn’t. Don’t lie.

              lol you dumbass read my initial comment on this article.

              your Von der Leyen quote which you implied to be incorrect.

              Yep, it was wildly premature to claim such a thing. And the data afterwards of the Russian economy hanging on for years have shown that.

              • Vergissmeinnicht@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                14 hours ago

                lol you dumbass read my initial comment on this article.

                Guess what I quoted above you illiterate clown

                Yep, it was wildly premature to claim such a thing. And the data afterwards of the Russian economy hanging on for years have shown that.

                So you finally answered my initial question, amazing. Took for fucking ever.

                No her claim was factual, dumbass.

                You just read “will drain Russia’s economy” and understand “will immediately lead to a meltdown of Russia’s economy”

                Don’t blame others for your illiteracy

                • Photonic@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  14 hours ago

                  Mate, you’ve shown time and time again that you don’t understand what is said.

                  Don’t quote it. Read it.

                  So you finally answered my initial question, amazing.

                  Ahhhh, so you were… how you say it… “just asking questions”?

                  And how many questions of mine have you not answered. My question to you was the answer dumbass. You could have figured it out for yourself. The sanctions were intended to drain the economy so much that Russia couldn’t continue fighting

                  And yes, she was wrong, as they were at their third sanction package at the time of that statement. They needed 17 (!) more to add on top of those. So no, those three packages in 2022 were not in fact draining the Russian economy, let alone the war machine.

                  Also, what you don’t get is the simple fact it was just one example. I’ve shown you a whole bunch more after that which you tried and failed to pick apart.

                  So yeah, I think you’re still very much the dumbass here :)

                  Sorry, better go look for that pink flying elephant up there.

                  • Vergissmeinnicht@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    13 hours ago

                    Don’t quote it. Read it.

                    Sure, let’s do that.

                    I’ll believe it when I see it. I have been hearing this since 2022 and they’re unleashing more and more ballistic missiles on Kyiv every week

                    I’ll believe it when I see it.

                    no mention of the word “headline”

                    I have been hearing this since 2022

                    no mention of the word “headline”

                    and they’re unleashing more and more ballistic missiles on Kyiv every week

                    no mention of the word “headline”

                    I said I will believe it when I see it, since I have seen people say things like the headline of this article for years

                    huh

                    And how many questions of mine have you not answered.

                    yeah, not engaging in your gish gallop

                    My question to you was the answer dumbass

                    no

                    The sanctions were intended to drain the economy so much that Russia couldn’t continue fighting

                    no, and that’s not what Von der Leyen said either.

                    That’s your wishful thinking based on incorrect understanding. Again, don’t blame others for your illiteracy.

                    There was discussion back in 2022 about what can and can’t be achieved with sanctions. And it was constantly reiterated that it would take years to have major economic impacts as Russia wears out industrial machinery beyond its useful lifetime, and burns through its substantial monetary reserves. The only short term hope was that the Russian elite would have more power and force Putin’s hand to protect their wealth.

                    So if you were one of the idiots who didn’t listen back then that it would take years, and then misinterpreted every clickbait headline as a factual statement about the immediate collapse of the Russian economy that’s on you. Maybe stick to simpler topics.

                  • Vergissmeinnicht@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    13 hours ago

                    Ahhhh, so you were… how you say it… “just asking questions”?

                    Since you’re still on about this, yes, I admit I was wrong about this.

                    I assumed you were informed on the subject matter and were “just asking questions” to push an agenda.

                    But turns out you were trying to employ the Socratic method. Which requires a deep understanding of the subject matter, which of course you lack. You’re just an idiot who doesn’t understand how economies work and who takes clickbait headlines as fact.

                    Me accusing you of “just asking questions” was giving you orders of magnitude more credit than you deserve.