• Photonic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    May I remind you of your first comment on this thread?

    >Ursula von der Leyen, 2022 Are you somehow implying that she was wrong?

    And again, I’m not just asking questions and I never claimed that. Questions are a normal part of life, get used to it.

    You know the end goal is to stop the war. That hasn’t happened. I’m asking you questions because you’re dancing around that disingenuously. The end goal cannot be to continue the war but at a lower pace and you know it.

    Cruise missile attacks are dropping because they’re much easier to take down than ballistic missiles.

    And you’re making it (again, disingenuously) seem like I said the sanctions aren’t having any effects. That is not what I said and you also know it. I said that despite the sanctions they are still ramping up ballistic missile attacks. So the message that they have hit their war economy limits is false. Since once you hit your limit –that’s what a limit means– you can’t continue.

    They have not stopped, ergo they have not reached the limit.

    According to whom?

    Really? You can’t even read the headline of the article this thread is under. How am I supposed to take you seriously?

    If you hear “wolf” when people say something else, that’s on you.

    Here are a whole bunch of people claiming exactly that:

    https://www.russiamatters.org/node/35164

    https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/currencies/russia-economy-worsens-current-account-ruble-energy-exports-2023-7

    https://www.chathamhouse.org/2025/09/fortress-russia-economy-has-adapted-well-pressure-stagflation-presents-opportunity-west

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2026/feb/06/the-russian-economy-is-finally-stagnating-what-does-it-mean-for-the-war-and-for-putin

    I’m beginning to think you don’t have a clue what you’re talking about…

    Not a statement, is it?

    Not the comment you initially replied to, is it? Disingenuous #3

    But good talk my man. Keep it up and nobody will ever want to talk to you.

    • Vergissmeinnicht@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Here are a whole bunch of people claiming exactly that:

      No they don’t, have you even read those articles?

      They make claims that are completely factual.

      Not the comment you initially replied to, is it? Disingenuous #3

      The original comment I replied to had a quote of Von der Leyen that you implied was making claims it didn’t.

      You know the end goal is to stop the war. That hasn’t happened.

      And you keep implying that sanctions aren’t having the effect of bringing that end sooner, which they do.

      So the message that they have hit their war economy limits is false

      You cannot possibly know if they’ve hit their limits because you can’t see the future. So you cannot say that this message is false.

      You keep saying that people have made that claim before, and it was false then, so it must be false now. But as your own sources show, nobody made this claim before.