• Babalugats@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Edited. Thanks. Wasn’t whitewashing Russia at all. I used Qwant, DDG, Google, and even asked a couple of AI bots, but couldn’t find anything about Russia using it. But I never said that they didn’t, because I am well aware that they commit war crimes too.

      • Gust@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Huh. Thats concerning if those kind of general searches about russian warcrimes are being suppressed. For reference, I remembered the bakhmut thing offhand so my search query for the article I linked was something super specific like “2023 bakhmut phosphorous”

        • Babalugats@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Yeah, I’ll have a look through my history and see how I phrased it, but it was something like “accusations of Russia using white phospherous or illegal weapons and war crimes” in a few different ways.

          ai was useless (no surprises) but thought I would see if it spat out anything different anyway. They just asked me for reference links to feed them with. Which I obviously didn’t have.

      • Gust@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The part where OP said there havent been any accusations of russia using white phosphorous bombs. There is proof of russia using those weapons in bakhmut in 2022, which is what I linked to.

        • mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Maybe he really didn’t know that russia used it too. I still don’t see strong evidence of him whitewashing Russia especially with his links about gross russian war crimes.

          • jaxxed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            You can debate the word whitewash, but his point is valid - op said no WP, but there is evidence of WP.

            Op also said that the comparison of condemnation can still be valid without the WP point.

            • Babalugats@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              I didn’t say no WP, I said I couldn’t find any accusations of it… and I couldn’t. But I have now added that link anyway.