• RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The picture in the op doesn’t look like agrivoltaics though. Compared to the agrivoltaics examples of the wiki article, the panels in the op are more densely placed, placed flatter, and placed closer to the ground. Nothing is getting harvested there, the most they could do is keep rabbits under them. From what I’ve seen in person, the non agri kind with panels over monoculture grass fields is much more common than agrivoltaics with cultivated fields.

    • The Stoned Hacker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      In the US it makes sense. Much of our corn is grown for ethanol so ot can be used for fuel. Replace that with solar and we reduce our reliance on a monocrop and end up with far far more power.

      • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        49 minutes ago

        They also use lots of irrigation from aquifers in the Great Plains, so they’ll need less irrigation and the shading will help a tiny bit with replenishing the aquifer.

        In northern Europe these solar fields make no sense at all to me though. When I see something like the fields below in my temperate marine climate, then I can’t help but think of the forest that could have been there.