• RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    They also use lots of irrigation from aquifers in the Great Plains, so they’ll need less irrigation and the shading will help a tiny bit with replenishing the aquifer.

    In northern Europe these solar fields make no sense at all to me though. When I see something like the fields below in my temperate marine climate, then I can’t help but think of the forest that could have been there.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 minute ago

      Turning it back into a forest will never happen when the land owner needs to pay taxes on the land and thus need to make income of the land. These solar fields are usual on private property. Not public land. Either they put windmills and solar on the fields or they raise cattle or grow crops. Which one is better for the environment overall?

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      If you destroy existing forest to make a farm, maybe. But if it’s an empty field and you want to do something with it, making it into a forest makes little sense. It’s complicated, very expensive, and doesn’t do much. Just let natural forests do their things, allow them to expand if you want more forests, don’t make one from scratch.