And, a recent tour of one of the Asian powerhouse’s vehicle plants has proved this beyond a shadow of a doubt, at least to Honda President and CEO Toshihiro Mibe.

“We have no chance against this,” Mibe said upon a visit to a Shanghai parts factory, commenting on its seamless automation across all levels of production. Logistics, procurement and all aspects of the process were so automated, in fact, that he did not spot a single human worker on the supplier’s floor.

Ford executives saying even three years ago that China was way ahead of the game

Toyota’s CEO has likewise said regarding not just his company, but the industry in general, “unless things change, we will not survive”

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    We are not being spyed on as long as we are not american or don’t buy new cars.

    • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Every state does internal espionage on its citizens, and external espionage on other states.

      Just because you don’t live in USA or China doesn’t excuse this.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Yes, but that is no reason to invite more of it. And this is not even government spying (they get the data I am sure) but corpo. A bad thing happening does not make it OK or normal.

        • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          invite more of it

          You’re not inviting more of it. You’re trading spying done by one nation/corp with spying done by another.

          Unless you think European espionage is somehow better than Chinese espionage.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            No I am not, I will not be buying any new car with spying tools in it. Its not an ether or, its a choice. If China puts out a car without touchscreens and spying they will become world sales leaders almost over night. That is how the free market is ment to work, but america has ruined the very concept (as is tradition) and not buying shit is not even seen as an option anymore.

            • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              not be buying any new car with spying tools in it

              Why do you have confidence that complex products like cars made, bought, and sold in the EU DON’T have any level of surveillance equipment installed to benefit the intelligence arms of the EU and its member states?

              Hard to believe in 2026.

              • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                I don’t and never stated anything about the EU or their cars. But best of luck in your argument with the person you have replaced me with in your head.

                • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  12 hours ago

                  I used the EU as an example. You never stated where you were going to purchase this ideal car, nor where this car would have been made.

                  How are you confident that even “old” cars made recently don’t have surveillance equipment installed by some actor, corp or government, similar to how smartphones have backdoors accessible to state intelligence agencies?

                  Unless you plan on buying cars before the addition of built-in GPS or “OnStar”-like systems, and clearly before cars started having built-in Wi-Fi and touchscreens, no car out there is entirely open-sourced in terms of hardware and software.

                  If you do plan on finding vehicles before that time period and can take care of one so it’s efficient and meets emissions standards, more power to you.

                  My original point about me critiquing you for calling out Chinese spying on their vehicles bought and sold in foreign countries still stands. As cars become more and more integrated with the Internet-of-Things (IoT) and has remotely telemetry capabilities, and if open source regulation lags behind, spying is the norm regardless of country. It’s biased to only think that China does this.

                  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 hours ago

                    I daily drive a 1985, the newest I have ever owned is a 2008 and will not change unless they make a non spying car. I have education in computer science and do know when a device is reporting in so no I will never have a vehicle with any sort of on star.

                    And this is the poison america has given to the world, the idea that you have to buy this shit. If people actually had the option to not buy the bullshit new they would. But the options are just removed, and not organically but from a cabal system of corporate interests. But there is a silver lining, people can not afford these new spy cars and debt is running out. The stuff around me driving around seems to be 1995 to 2010 at the moment, not due to what people prefer but what they can afford.

                    The idea that people have to live with shit is pathetic. As I said if given the option people would take the cheap non IoT things, but they don’t make that stuff. The free market has become the freedom to buy what they sell you, and that’s perverse.