• Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Then read the article. They found debris from starlink satellites on the ground, which is horrifying if you consider they want to increase the number of satellites by a factor of 100x and make them much bigger to build datacenters in space.
    That plan would lead to one re-entry every three minutes, depositing insane amounts of plastics and metals in the atmosphere even if they would burn up completely.

    • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Is anyone really planning on building data centers in space? I assume everyone who knows how physics works is aware that cooling will be nearly impossible with today’s tech.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        How big do you think these are going to be? A lot of people seem to have this concept of these massive things in space and that’s not what it’s going to be.

        Starlink v3 already need to radiate 20kw of heat away, these are going to be 100kw.

        They aren’t huge, they are many.

        Well, the heat generating datacenter part isn’t anyway… the solar panels and radiators will be quite large once unfolded.

        Edit: Clarity above, but also here’s an image which they say is to scale.

        See how small the actually data center portion is? Those solar panels are super thin and will fold up super tiny, and so will the radiator. Even if the radiator size is wrong, the main point is these things are small, and not what you should think of when you think data center. I think someone else likened the size to a server rack or two.