• Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The deal benefited Israel as well… what are you talking about!?

    What the deal did not include was: praise for the orange pedophile and/or distraction for his crimes or Bibi’s

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Did an edit to add that before I saw your reply. Don’t buy what Israel tells you about how they love the Iranian people. Consider Israel’s material interests.

      E: Also it’s fairly public fact that Israel lobbied against the deal and following it lobbied for repeal.

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Consider Israel’s material interests.

        Hmmmm how about no… Israel had a chance but decided to become the new Nazis… they can go fuck themselves back to the stone age for all I care

        • MartianSands@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          14 hours ago

          “consider” as in “you won’t understand why Israel does what it does unless you think about”, it doesn’t mean “give them what they want”

          • Jhex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            14 hours ago

            yes, I understood… but again, this is the slippery slope where “the best move” is justified regardless how heartless and immoral it may be

            My point is I do not care what Israel had to win by this. This is wrong and they should pay dearly for their crimes against humanity

          • Jhex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Yes but this is the slippery slope that can justify any and all atrocities…

            • SaltSong@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              13 hours ago

              There is a difference between “justify” and “explain.” He’s not saying what happened is OK, he’s explaining why some people were motivated to ruin what most purple thought of as a good thing.

              • Jhex@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                13 hours ago

                There is a difference between “justify” and “explain.”

                Again I UNDERSTOOD… but this is a slippery slope, “explaining” why “it makes sense” to commit genocide is too close to the SLIPPERY SLOPE I am complaining about

                • SaltSong@startrek.website
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  You keep saying “I understand” and then displaying that you don’t understand.

                  I mean, I can explain why Grand Moff Tarken blew up Alderaan. I understand why he chose to do that. There is no slippery slope from there to “it’s ok to blow up planets.”

                  It is crucial that you understand the motivations of your enemy, and understand why he makes the decisions he does. You aren’t going to defeat him by guesswork.

                  • Jhex@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    13 hours ago

                    What part makes you think I do not understand?

                    There is no slippery slope from there to “it’s ok to blow up planets.”

                    Absolutely there is… go into ANY forum on US politics and you’ll find the most immoral decisions labeled as “it was their best move”… if you go further you’ll see those turned into “they’d be stupid not to do it”… and so forth