The amount of untaxed wealth hidden offshore by the richest 0.1 percent exceeds the entire wealth of the poorest half of humanity (4.1 billion people), reveals new Oxfam analysis published today ahead of the 10th anniversary of the Panama Papers. The findings show that, a decade later, the super-rich continue to exploit offshore systems to evade taxes and conceal assets, highlighting the urgent need for coordinated international action to tax extreme wealth and end the use of tax havens.

Oxfam estimates that $3.55 trillion in untaxed wealth was stashed offshore in tax havens and unreported accounts in 2024. This sum exceeds the GDP of France and is more than twice the combined GDP of the world’s 44 least developed countries.

The richest 0.1 percent holds approximately 80 percent of all untaxed offshore wealth, or around $2.84 trillion. Within this tiny group, the ultra-wealthiest 0.01 percent holds roughly half ($1.77 trillion).

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    If America has a major revolution, I suspect many of the financial assets would turn out to be smoke and mirrors, rather than something of concrete value.

  • wowwoweowza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’s LITERALLY just 16 families. Far fewer people than .1 percent. It’s 2 ten millionths of one percent.

  • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    8.2 billion people, so 0.1% of that is 8.2 million people

    2.83 trillion dollars held in accounts to evade taxes means that approximately $345,000 per person is held in accounts offshore.

    That seems low, in a way. I expected it to be in the dozens of millions per person. It’s also possible that my math is wrong.

    • 3abas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I think it’s 0.1% of wealth owning households, which would be closer to $1.42 million.

      That would also mean the richest 0.01% are close to $8.85 million each.

      Assuming 2 billion households, this is rough math.

    • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The 0.01 holds 1.77 trillion so the distribution is skewed. Furthermore there are likely many thousands of accounts in the ‘small’ amounts of tens of thousands, ostensibly for every member of an extended family in things like trust funds, etc.

  • Jimbel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    14 hours ago

    But still to manny ordinary people rage out when higher taxes for billionaires are discussed.

  • thingAmaBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Yep, these people definitely have some sort of disease. No one needs nor would be able to spend that kind of money. Just completely insane.

    • a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      52 minutes ago

      Its neurological basis for it is probably similar to that of hoarding. Hoarders might be billionaires who just never accumulated wealth

  • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    0.1% still equates to 8.1m people; instead, if we we’re to focus focus on the Top 1%, of the Top 1% of the Top 1% - that is only ~8,100 people.

    Holding their feet to the fire, and getting them to co tribute their fair share - despite their dragon’s hoard of wealth - would quickly bring those below them with less wealth in line.

    e.g. Make an example out of Elon Musk, and the Ellison’s would quickly fall in line.

      • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Nah, I put that argument in the same camp as “if you tax them, they will move” in New York; pure bluster and ultimately an empty threat of Mutually Assured Destruction.

        If a billionaire takes out a loan against their stock portfolio (as they so often do); force that to be treated as a Capital Gains taxable event. L

        • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          For real. If they aren’t paying in, who cares if they leave wherever they are threatening to leave anyway. Just go, don’t let the trickle hit you in the economics on the way out

  • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Wonder if there’s a way to force all outstanding Treasury notes outside of the country to need to return back to treasury for renewal or otherwise be written off at invalid debt.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not while the people running the USA are the same people who hide their immense wealth overseas.

      • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 day ago

        Given the last Panama paper and similar leaks it’s much broader than USA :(

        It’s a global class issue.

        • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          When Ukraine ousted their previous dictator, the Planet Money podcast had a piece on how the Ukrainian presidential palace had been effectively looted, and traced the absurdly long chain of shell companies that kept the actual owner obscured.

          Also, the Vox/Netflix documentary series “Explained” had a genuinely good episode about billionaires. One of the things they brought up was that oligarchs store a lot of money in US real estate, like super-expensive NY condos.

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            It was nearly a decade ago when I saw this, but there was a documentary, I think it was called The Spider’s Web or something like that.

            Basically it was about shell companies and “trusts,” mostly centered in the Virgin Islands, where billionaires were keeping their real wealth obscured in off-shore banks.

            It was mostly focused on wealthy Brits who derived their generational wealth from colonialism. It was pretty interesting though.

            The guy was doing some investigative journalism, but obviously he wasn’t let into any of the buildings, and once he started to attract notice he started receiving threats and stuff. But he traced money trails backwards and they basically never led to individual people who could be held accountable for the money or how it was used.

            Looking back now, I wonder how much of Epstein’s wealth was in those banks…

            • a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              27 minutes ago

              Are there shadow billionaires? Billionaires who are not officially recognized as such because they do such a good job of hiding their wealth?

      • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh yeah, I just mean academically. We would need to be on a much different anti oligarchy footing to actually implement. But in the meantime, I like to noodle out systems and mechanisms.

        Let’s say we eventually get to a renewed trust buster energy like we used the last time we broke up the corporate giants long ago.

        Is there anything we could realistically do even with full control of the government, or is that money basically propping up the entire interconnected world economy?

        • Arctic_monkey@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          We need a global solution. The scale of economic power is larger than the scale of our democratically controlled political power. Nationalism won’t save us.

    • CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The problem is that most of these assets are digitally held. What we need is an anonymous type attack against these accounts, similar in style to what they did in Mr. Robot.

      Make it near impossible for the government to claw the money back.

      • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I dunno I think the problem is the billionaires hoarding the money not the government trying to claw some of the money back, but that’s just me.

    • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you write off Treasury notes we have to either accept that MMT is real and that we can print money when needed.

      Or we’d need to destroy an equal amount of money to the treasury note.

      Or if MMT isn’t accurate (unlikely) then we’d see inflation as the government would effectively be unsecuring it’s debts.

      • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Well could we somehow do it via serial number on the notes maybe? Like let’s say we use the event to denote a switch to color money instead of green only. And then we say in 10 years, all green money is expired and worthless, so every note has to come back into the Treasury to get renewed, and at that time be potentially subjected to repatriation taxes.

        Think something like that could work?

        • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          That would be a mechanism for doing it, I’m just pointing out that, according to most economic theories (which I think are wrong) money requires Treasury notes to exist, otherwise you’re printing money which most economists claim will cause inflation.