• ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    And I’m sure like french laicite this will be enforced unequally and will discriminate in order to target minorities.

    • scutiger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It doesn’t need to. I don’t think anyone but Muslims is required to pray multiple times a day and need places to do so. It’s specifically meant to be an anti-Muslim law.

      Just like making it illegal for anybody to sleep under a bridge. Surely that wasn’t aimed at the homeless, right?

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Muslims don’t need places to do so (Friday prayer aside), but they have to pray somewhere and they’re also forbidding praying in the street.

        • LongLive@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Defining prayer is difficult, surely?
          Would that be a catch all cause for investigations?

          I figure this will be compared to thought-crime law.

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            “The suspect was seen sitting on a park bench with his eyes closed, his head inclined, and his hands clasped in his lap. So you see, your honor, and I submit to the jury, that the suspect was indeed clearly praying in public, and I motion to add a charge of perjury, for lying to this court under oath when he stated ‘I was just resting my eyes.’”