• scutiger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    It doesn’t need to. I don’t think anyone but Muslims is required to pray multiple times a day and need places to do so. It’s specifically meant to be an anti-Muslim law.

    Just like making it illegal for anybody to sleep under a bridge. Surely that wasn’t aimed at the homeless, right?

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Muslims don’t need places to do so (Friday prayer aside), but they have to pray somewhere and they’re also forbidding praying in the street.

      • LongLive@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Defining prayer is difficult, surely?
        Would that be a catch all cause for investigations?

        I figure this will be compared to thought-crime law.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          “The suspect was seen sitting on a park bench with his eyes closed, his head inclined, and his hands clasped in his lap. So you see, your honor, and I submit to the jury, that the suspect was indeed clearly praying in public, and I motion to add a charge of perjury, for lying to this court under oath when he stated ‘I was just resting my eyes.’”