For it not to become perceived as “fucking with a company” competition should be normal, and it’s normal when the winning side is often enough the new competitor. In other words, if there were a few companies making office suites, compatible between each other, and none of them would hold hegemony.

Because what’s perceived is defined by what those holding power think. When they change often through competition, they hail competition. When they are the same companies for 30 years, then they would publicly flog and hang you for it if they could.

Similar to how in Linux 2.2 days some functionality lacking or some anarchist spirit were normal, and now Linux is almost authoritarian as a community. Because it’s the main thing in its niche.

Or how Apple Computer was a good company when they were competing with Microsoft and others for normal personal computer market, and became crap after they’ve achieved long hegemony for the luxury segment.

Even Microsoft itself - when they feared some competition, it was W2K and XP, and when they stopped, it was the rest since.

People don’t really believe in things they don’t experience. Others’ dignity/freedom/safety is important for a human when their own depends on it.

Not really. A normal thing for most functional states 50 years ago. A comprehensive pipeline of training and preparation for various industrial and military roles.

From first aid to orientation on terrain to radio knowledge to flag signals. Flight clubs, other relevant sports, small arms disassembly and assembly. What to do in case of an emergency. Chemistry, electric engineering, mechanical engineering.

Computer games weren’t a thing, and cheap small drone planes too. But this is pretty normal, except nothing is official, because today nation-states prefer gray schemes.