• 0 Posts
  • 145 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 22nd, 2026

help-circle

  • It has to be worth, not just income. There’s too many loopholes around “I don’t have income I just have stock I use as collateral for a loan” or “I don’t have income but my LLC happens to pay for all of my daily expenses”.

    But yes, all fines need to scale with the perpetrator. The more dollars you have, the less each dollar means.

    A $100 ticket for parking on a crosswalk means nothing to a millionaire, but is potentially ruinous for someone living in poverty. It needs to hurt the same for everyone. The millionaire should have to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars. They need to feel pain.

    A lot of people are really shitty and operate at a very basic level of moral reasoning. It’s just “did I get punished?”.







  • jtrek@startrek.websitetomemes@lemmy.world•Flawless strategy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    18 days ago

    there is no environment or time where an approach would be appreciated

    Doesn’t really follow from

    women want to be left alone and be independent

    There’s a lot of spaces between “don’t hit on the waitress” and “chat with friends of friends at a birthday party”

    Of course, you do have to enter the world to be perceived by the world.









  • If you haven’t read Eco’s essay on ur-fascism, it’s a good read: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/umberto-eco-ur-fascism

    So we come to my second point. There was only one Nazism. We cannot label Franco’s hyper-Catholic Falangism as Nazism, since Nazism is fundamentally pagan, polytheistic, and anti-Christian. But the fascist game can be played in many forms, and the name of the game does not change. The notion of fascism is not unlike Wittgenstein’s notion of a game. A game can be either competitive or not, it can require some special skill or none, it can or cannot involve money. Games are different activities that display only some “family resemblance,” as Wittgenstein put it. Consider the following sequence:

    1___2___3___4

    abc bcd cde def

    Suppose there is a series of political groups in which group one is characterized by the features abc, group two by the features bcd, and so on. Group two is similar to group one since they have two features in common; for the same reasons three is similar to two and four is similar to three. Notice that three is also similar to one (they have in common the feature c). The most curious case is presented by four, obviously similar to three and two, but with no feature in common with one. However, owing to the uninterrupted series of decreasing similarities between one and four, there remains, by a sort of illusory transitivity, a family resemblance between four and one.

    Fascism became an all-purpose term because one can eliminate from a fascist regime one or more features, and it will still be recognizable as fascist. Take away imperialism from fascism and you still have Franco and Salazar. Take away colonialism and you still have the Balkan fascism of the Ustashes. Add to the Italian fascism a radical anti-capitalism (which never much fascinated Mussolini) and you have Ezra Pound. Add a cult of Celtic mythology and the Grail mysticism (completely alien to official fascism) and you have one of the most respected fascist gurus, Julius Evola.



  • I dunno it seems like the Republican arguments are stupid and the left wing ones are based on facts and evidence.

    A bike lane is equity. It is freedom of movement. It is accessibility for someone who cannot drive. It is independence for a 12-year-old riding to school on their own — and an hour back in their mother’s day. It is law and order, using engineering to prevent tragedy instead of reacting to it after the fact. It is Make America Healthy Again — bringing Americans outside, safely. It is economic development.

    This is all stuff the left says (minus the Maha branding). The right doesn’t listen. They’re too busy marinating in their feelings.