hopesdead

Poor choice of words. The ethnicity wasn’t a major characterization.

You’re thinking of Wallace Shawn.

It was a shock that Brie said she regretted the role of Diane Nguyen. There was nothing about the character that was specifically about being Vietnamese woman or Asian that was a big characterization for Diane. Even in the last season, the episode which she travels to Vietnam didn’t include anything which whitewashed the character. That is the only time in Bojack Horseman that the series addressed the ethnicity of the character. Even in the episode she travels to Boston to visit family, it never brought up cultural things. Never once heard backlash against Brie for voicing the character. As an Asian, I never felt uncomfortable with the Brie voicing an Asian person.

I still don’t understand it after all these years.

If they had gotten the same actor who played the college football player, that would have made it better. They made a call back to the sketch in one of the East-West Bowl sketches where a player is named AY AY RON.

But you agreed to be in a television show about seniors that make ergonomic sex toys for seniors?

Pretty much one of the best sketches they did.

If one of you’ll says some silly ass name, this whole class is gonna feel my wrath.

It’s called racism.

If they are “fake”… then why is he upset? They aren’t real ads. Right?

Well OAN is known for presenting literal hoaxes as news, so they seem comfortable with lies being given to them.

Surprised that Fox is on here.

Please don’t say artisanal. That is a bullshit word. There is such a thing called speciality which is a technical term for coffee that is graded at 80-100 points. If you are using words like artisanal or gourmet, you are not knowable. Those in my opinion are bullshit words that make poor quality coffee sound fancy and super gross.

I only drink speciality.

https://sca.coffee/research/what-is-specialty-coffee

Back in 2019 during the commodity crisis when the price was below a $1, they pretended to contribute lots of money to helping their farmers. The company publicly announced they were donating money to the farms they owned. That amount based on available financial data suggested that that money was equal to a single afternoon’s profits.

The point here is that Starbucks could have been contributing to the falling price of commodities, which they should have released more current financial data for. More transparency would have given a better idea if they were having a positive or negative impact. What this all boiled down to was simply saying what they paid their farms. If they did that, it would have been better.

https://sprudge.com/the-starbucks-traceability-tool-is-not-a-transparency-report-167713.html

No it is not.

Please don’t consume Starbucks. They have a reputation for buying from farms in Brazil and Guatemala that employe slave labor and child labor.

EDIT: Starbucks also abuses the Italian language. None of their drinks are what they claim to be. That mocha you had is too large to be a mocha.

If they turn out to be dead, that would be a shame. Can’t have the award. Secondly, that would make the committee look bad.

EDIT: Just to be clear in case you are unaware, only people who are alive can qualify for an award.

If anyone says aliens, I’m just going to call you speciesist towards your own people.

Tobias Funke would like a word.

Now I’m expecting a Sesame Street episode where Keanu Reeves gives the lessons on how to be nice.